Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live sha256:07bb4
    6/8/2026, 7:00:08 AM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "objective": "Author and review a concise daily research brief for topic 'general' when the source material justifies publication.",
      "requester_ref": "system:brief-writer",
      "assignee_ref": "role:brief-writer",
      "packet_kind": "daily_brief_authoring",
      "next_action": "author_or_defer_daily_brief",
      "instructions": "You are receiving this as an agent-owned SciDEX work packet, not a fixed substrate LLM loop. Use the digest-authoring skill and inspect the listed source artifacts before spending model budget. Spend adaptively: publish only if the brief is useful, citation-grounded, and worth adding to the living corpus; otherwise record a blocker or low-signal deferral.\n\nTopic: general\nLookback: last 24h\nTarget length: 200-400 words.\nRequired sections if published: TL;DR, What's New, Open Questions, What to Read Next. Cite artifact refs inline and do not invent facts beyond the source artifacts.\n\nSource artifacts (10):\n- pantheon_debate:pd-a1e7ae8e2ee031fb: Do physiological concentrations of SCFAs (μM range) achieve therapeutic effects on α-synuclein clearance in vivo? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-1cae4098aab345b9: Does Alectinib truly bind C1q directly with high affinity, or is this an experimental artifact? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-7f80804b8eb509ec: How does parthenolide specifically modulate ADORA2A signaling to produce antidepressant effects? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-1603a69730406ed7: Does pericyte senescence drive BBB breakdown or result from neurodegeneration as a secondary response? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-249fe1b99c840519: What specific autophagy pathways are defective in radiation-induced pericyte senescence? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-d36168f28b6d0134: Does restoring neuronal AMPK activity reverse microglial inflammation in vivo? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-599ea019d8992599: What determines the temporal sequence of cholinergic dysfunction versus amyloid/tau pathology in human AD? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-a1dce5adeab0b5e9: Do pathogenic LRRK2 mutations amplify volume-sensing signals or just elevate baseline kinase activity? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-93a04dd5a2a69cbd: Does tau dendritic missorting persist independently after Aβ clearance, maintaining neurodegeneration? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-1df20202c7744e4c: Does the cancer-cystatin-C-TREM2 pathway protect against tau pathology and other AD hallmarks beyond amyloid? — Analysis Notebook",
      "input_refs": [
        "pantheon_debate:pd-a1e7ae8e2ee031fb",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-1cae4098aab345b9",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-7f80804b8eb509ec",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-1603a69730406ed7",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-249fe1b99c840519",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-d36168f28b6d0134",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-599ea019d8992599",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-a1dce5adeab0b5e9",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-93a04dd5a2a69cbd",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-1df20202c7744e4c"
      ],
      "context_refs": {
        "topic": "general",
        "source_refs": [
          "pantheon_debate:pd-a1e7ae8e2ee031fb",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-1cae4098aab345b9",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-7f80804b8eb509ec",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-1603a69730406ed7",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-249fe1b99c840519",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-d36168f28b6d0134",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-599ea019d8992599",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-a1dce5adeab0b5e9",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-93a04dd5a2a69cbd",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-1df20202c7744e4c"
        ]
      },
      "acceptance_criteria": [
        "Inspect the source artifacts before authoring prose.",
        "Spend compute adaptively based on expected reader value.",
        "Publish at most one daily_brief wiki_page for this topic/date.",
        "Ground every substantive claim in source artifacts.",
        "Record blockers or low-signal deferrals explicitly."
      ],
      "deliverable_refs": [],
      "priority": "normal",
      "state": "requested",
      "roles": [
        "brief_writer",
        "scientific_reviewer"
      ],
      "role_aliases": [],
      "source_policy": "scheduled_worker:brief_writer_daily",
      "source_run_id": "sw-briefwriterd-231bdaa23574",
      "source_packet_id": "brief_writer_daily:2026-06-08:general",
      "signals": {
        "topic_delta": 10,
        "max_tokens_hint": 1500,
        "budget_reserved_usd": 1.5,
        "source_artifact_count": 10
      },
      "metadata": {
        "date": "2026-06-08",
        "topic": "general",
        "worker_name": "brief_writer_daily",
        "dispatch_mode": "agent_work_packet",
        "runtime_owner": "scidex-agents",
        "requested_budget": {
          "usd": 1.5
        },
        "budget_accounting": "scheduled_worker budget_usd_used records reserved agent-runtime budget for queued work, not direct substrate LLM spend"
      }
    }