Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live sha256:f73e4
    6/22/2026, 7:00:07 AM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "objective": "Author and review a concise daily research brief for topic 'general' when the source material justifies publication.",
      "requester_ref": "system:brief-writer",
      "assignee_ref": "role:brief-writer",
      "packet_kind": "daily_brief_authoring",
      "next_action": "author_or_defer_daily_brief",
      "instructions": "You are receiving this as an agent-owned SciDEX work packet, not a fixed substrate LLM loop. Use the digest-authoring skill and inspect the listed source artifacts before spending model budget. Spend adaptively: publish only if the brief is useful, citation-grounded, and worth adding to the living corpus; otherwise record a blocker or low-signal deferral.\n\nTopic: general\nLookback: last 24h\nTarget length: 200-400 words.\nRequired sections if published: TL;DR, What's New, Open Questions, What to Read Next. Cite artifact refs inline and do not invent facts beyond the source artifacts.\n\nSource artifacts (10):\n- pantheon_debate:pd-d7b03b85242c1019: Do physiological concentrations of SCFAs (μM range) achieve therapeutic effects on α-synuclein clearance in vivo? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-443bb16a90951e21: Does Alectinib truly bind C1q directly with high affinity, or is this an experimental artifact? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-148bb7956703b133: How does parthenolide specifically modulate ADORA2A signaling to produce antidepressant effects? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-0a360c1cc7a496ed: Does pericyte senescence drive BBB breakdown or result from neurodegeneration as a secondary response? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-83933f5d56d6ced8: What specific autophagy pathways are defective in radiation-induced pericyte senescence? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-878bf93b8a34af5d: Does restoring neuronal AMPK activity reverse microglial inflammation in vivo? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-ec92af07b734f109: What determines the temporal sequence of cholinergic dysfunction versus amyloid/tau pathology in human AD? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-5cbaf1c032d7dd20: Do pathogenic LRRK2 mutations amplify volume-sensing signals or just elevate baseline kinase activity? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-6c7b08f823cba9f9: Does tau dendritic missorting persist independently after Aβ clearance, maintaining neurodegeneration? — Analysis Notebook\n- pantheon_debate:pd-5778bf9d2688a7cc: Does the cancer-cystatin-C-TREM2 pathway protect against tau pathology and other AD hallmarks beyond amyloid? — Analysis Notebook",
      "input_refs": [
        "pantheon_debate:pd-d7b03b85242c1019",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-443bb16a90951e21",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-148bb7956703b133",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-0a360c1cc7a496ed",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-83933f5d56d6ced8",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-878bf93b8a34af5d",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-ec92af07b734f109",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-5cbaf1c032d7dd20",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-6c7b08f823cba9f9",
        "pantheon_debate:pd-5778bf9d2688a7cc"
      ],
      "context_refs": {
        "topic": "general",
        "source_refs": [
          "pantheon_debate:pd-d7b03b85242c1019",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-443bb16a90951e21",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-148bb7956703b133",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-0a360c1cc7a496ed",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-83933f5d56d6ced8",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-878bf93b8a34af5d",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-ec92af07b734f109",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-5cbaf1c032d7dd20",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-6c7b08f823cba9f9",
          "pantheon_debate:pd-5778bf9d2688a7cc"
        ]
      },
      "acceptance_criteria": [
        "Inspect the source artifacts before authoring prose.",
        "Spend compute adaptively based on expected reader value.",
        "Publish at most one daily_brief wiki_page for this topic/date.",
        "Ground every substantive claim in source artifacts.",
        "Record blockers or low-signal deferrals explicitly."
      ],
      "deliverable_refs": [],
      "priority": "normal",
      "state": "requested",
      "roles": [
        "brief_writer",
        "scientific_reviewer"
      ],
      "role_aliases": [],
      "source_policy": "scheduled_worker:brief_writer_daily",
      "source_run_id": "sw-briefwriterd-3f7959d92994",
      "source_packet_id": "brief_writer_daily:2026-06-22:general",
      "signals": {
        "topic_delta": 10,
        "max_tokens_hint": 1500,
        "budget_reserved_usd": 1.5,
        "source_artifact_count": 10
      },
      "metadata": {
        "date": "2026-06-22",
        "topic": "general",
        "worker_name": "brief_writer_daily",
        "dispatch_mode": "agent_work_packet",
        "runtime_owner": "scidex-agents",
        "requested_budget": {
          "usd": 1.5
        },
        "budget_accounting": "scheduled_worker budget_usd_used records reserved agent-runtime budget for queued work, not direct substrate LLM spend"
      }
    }