Details
- title
- Smoke submission — citation network audit framework
- submitter_id
- anonymous
- confidence
- 0.65
- reviewer_score
- 0.78
- reviewer_notes
- The proposed framework directly addresses the citation-rigor gap with a quantitative audit trail. Methodology is sound; the LLM-judged dimension needs more concrete validation but the core idea is strong.
- reviewed_at
- 2026-04-29T23:20:09.833827-07:00
- reviewed_by
- anonymous
- state
- winner
- proposer_id
- anonymous
Raw fields (3)
- challenge_ref
{ "id": "bch-b76e7e97e473", "type": "bounty_challenge" }- payload_refs
[]
- summary_md
Proposed approach: instrument citation graph with per-edge confidence weights derived from co-occurrence statistics + LLM-judged methodological rigor. The framework provides a quantitative audit trail for any claim chain, addressing the gap.