Version history

{
  "scope": "The modulatory effect of adaptive deep brain stimulation on beta bursts in Parkinson's disease.",
  "claim_text": "For the post hoc comparison between adaptive DBS and noStim we found that the number of short bursts (200–300 ms and 300–400 ms) was higher during adaptive DBS compared to noStim [ t (15) = 2.750, P = 0.045; t (15) = 3.126, P = 0.049].",
  "raw_fields": {
    "n": null,
    "doi": "10.1093/brain/awx010",
    "claim": "For the post hoc comparison between adaptive DBS and noStim we found that the number of short bursts (200–300 ms and 300–400 ms) was higher during adaptive DBS compared to noStim [ t (15) = 2.750, P = 0.045; t (15) = 3.126, P = 0.049].",
    "cite_key": "Tinkhauser2017",
    "evidence": " (, 2017); Tinkhauser G, Pogosyan A, Little S, Beudel M, Herz DM, Tan H, Brown P.",
    "effect_size": null,
    "text_access": "fulltext",
    "study_system": "The modulatory effect of adaptive deep brain stimulation on beta bursts in Parkinson's disease.",
    "source_cluster_id": "cluster_13",
    "replication_status": "replication_unknown",
    "claim_source_sentence": "For the post hoc comparison between adaptive DBS and noStim we found that the number of short bursts (200–300 ms and 300–400 ms) was higher during adaptive DBS compared to noStim [ t (15) = 2.750, P = 0.045; t (15) = 3.126, P = 0.049].",
    "replication_evidence_dois": [],
    "effect_size_source_sentence": "Post hoc tests showed that the percentage of integrated amplitude of short bursts (% of the sum of the integrated amplitude across all the time windows) was higher in adaptive DBS compared to noStim [ t (15) = 4.747, P = 0.001] and conventional DBS [ t (15) = 3.310, P = 0.014]."
  },
  "section_id": "section_14",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
  "effect_size": null,
  "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewLoops",
  "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-14",
  "source_kind": "review_finding",
  "source_path": "evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
  "source_refs": [
    "paper:paper-1299e108826e"
  ],
  "source_span": "For the post hoc comparison between adaptive DBS and noStim we found that the number of short bursts (200–300 ms and 300–400 ms) was higher during adaptive DBS compared to noStim [ t (15) = 2.750, P = 0.045; t (15) = 3.126, P = 0.049].",
  "study_system": "The modulatory effect of adaptive deep brain stimulation on beta bursts in Parkinson's disease.",
  "evidence_refs": [
    {
      "ref": "paper:paper-1299e108826e"
    }
  ],
  "section_title": "Loop Dysfunction in Neurological and Psychiatric Disease",
  "source_policy": {
    "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
    "notes": [
      "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
      "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
    ],
    "source_commit_sha": "0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b",
    "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops"
  },
  "evidence_summary": " (, 2017); Tinkhauser G, Pogosyan A, Little S, Beudel M, Herz DM, Tan H, Brown P.",
  "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9",
  "replication_status": "replication_unknown",
  "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9",
  "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-14",
  "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
  "commit_sha": "0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b",
  "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
  "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops"
}