Mukherjee 2024 mouse — M1->S1 corticocortical optogenetic + paired-style E inpu…

{
  "n": null,
  "doi": "10.1523/eneuro.0154-24.2024",
  "claim": "Mukherjee 2024 mouse — M1->S1 corticocortical optogenetic + paired-style E inputs onto S1 L5 IT/PT subclasses.",
  "cite_key": "Kim2024b",
  "evidence": "In the rodent whisker system, active sensing and sensorimotor integration are mediated in part by the dynamic interactions between the motor cortex (M1) and somatosensory cortex (S1). However, understanding these dynamic interactions requires knowledge about the synapses and how specific neurons respond to their input. Here, we combined optogenetics, retrograde labeling, and electrophysiology to characterize the synaptic connections between M1 and layer 5 (L5) intratelencephalic (IT) and pyramidal tract (PT) neurons in S1 of mice (both sexes). We found that M1 synapses onto IT cells displayed modest short-term depression, whereas synapses onto PT neurons showed robust short-term facilitation. Despite M1 inputs to IT cells depressing, their slower kinetics resulted in summation and a response that increased during short trains. In contrast, summation was minimal in PT neurons due to the fast time course of their M1 responses. The functional consequences of this reduced summation, however, were outweighed by the strong facilitation at these M1 synapses, resulting in larger response amplitudes in PT neurons than IT cells during repetitive stimulation. To understand the impact of facil",
  "effect_size": null,
  "text_access": "abstract_only",
  "study_system": "Functional Dynamics and Selectivity of Two Parallel Corticocortical Pathways from Motor Cortex to Layer 5 Circuits in Somatosensory Cortex.",
  "argument_role": "supporting",
  "replication_status": null,
  "claim_source_sentence": "Here, we combined optogenetics, retrograde labeling, and electrophysiology to c[haracterize functional dynamics and selectivity of two parallel corticocortical pathways from mouse motor to somatosensory cortex L5].",
  "source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match",
  "replication_evidence_dois": [],
  "effect_size_source_sentence": null
}

[
  "paper:paper-4f08ea59de5f"
]

[
  {
    "ref": "paper:paper-4f08ea59de5f"
  }
]

{
  "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
  "notes": [
    "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
    "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
  ],
  "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
  "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
}

In the rodent whisker system, active sensing and sensorimotor integration are mediated in part by the dynamic interactions between the motor cortex (M1) and somatosensory cortex (S1). However, understanding these dynamic interactions requires knowledge about the synapses and how specific neurons respond to their input. Here, we combined optogenetics, retrograde labeling, and electrophysiology to characterize the synaptic connections between M1 and layer 5 (L5) intratelencephalic (IT) and pyramidal tract (PT) neurons in S1 of mice (both sexes). We found that M1 synapses onto IT cells displayed modest short-term depression, whereas synapses onto PT neurons showed robust short-term facilitation. Despite M1 inputs to IT cells depressing, their slower kinetics resulted in summation and a response that increased during short trains. In contrast, summation was minimal in PT neurons due to the fast time course of their M1 responses. The functional consequences of this reduced summation, however, were outweighed by the strong facilitation at these M1 synapses, resulting in larger response amplitudes in PT neurons than IT cells during repetitive stimulation. To understand the impact of facilitating M1 inputs on PT output, we paired trains of inputs with single backpropagating action potentials, finding that repetitive M1 activation increased the probability of bursts in PT cells without impacting the time dependence of this coupling. Thus, there are two parallel but dynamically distinct systems of M1 synaptic excitation in L5 of S1, each defined by the short-term dynamics of its synapses, the class of postsynaptic neurons, and how the neurons respond to those inputs.