Details

scope
recurrent excitatory-inhibitory rate / spiking model of primary visual cortex (cat V1)
section_id
section_13
source_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json
effect_size
qualitative
review_repo
ComputationalReviewRecurrence
section_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models
source_kind
review_finding
source_path
evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json
source_span
Strong balanced amplification arises when feedback inhibition stabilizes strong recurrent excitation, a pattern likely to be typical of cortex.
study_system
recurrent excitatory-inhibitory rate / spiking model of primary visual cortex (cat V1)
section_title
13. Attractor-network models — Hopfield, ring, line, bump; what each model requires of the cortical E→E matrix and what the mouse empirical record provides
evidence_summary
Establishes inhibition-stabilised cortex as a generic recurrent regime alternative to pure attractor amplification; mouse-cortex theory papers explicitly contrast ISN balanced amplification against bump-attractor amplification.
review_bundle_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9
replication_status
independently_replicated
review_package_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9
source_artifact_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models
origin_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json
commit_sha
79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f
created_by
persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience
repository_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence
Raw fields (5)
claim_text
Strong feedback inhibition stabilizing recurrent excitation produces 'balanced amplification' — selective, transient amplification of activity patterns via effective feedforward connectivity between E and I — providing an alternative to lifetime-elongation (slow-decay) explanations of evoked-vs-spontaneous similarity in cortex.
raw_fields
{
  "n": 0,
  "doi": "10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.005",
  "claim": "Strong feedback inhibition stabilizing recurrent excitation produces 'balanced amplification' — selective, transient amplification of activity patterns via effective feedforward connectivity between E and I — providing an alternative to lifetime-elongation (slow-decay) explanations of evoked-vs-spontaneous similarity in cortex.",
  "cite_key": "Murphy2009",
  "evidence": "Establishes inhibition-stabilised cortex as a generic recurrent regime alternative to pure attractor amplification; mouse-cortex theory papers explicitly contrast ISN balanced amplification against bump-attractor amplification.",
  "effect_size": "qualitative",
  "text_access": "abstract_only",
  "study_system": "recurrent excitatory-inhibitory rate / spiking model of primary visual cortex (cat V1)",
  "argument_role": "supporting",
  "replication_status": "independently_replicated",
  "claim_source_sentence": "Strong balanced amplification arises when feedback inhibition stabilizes strong recurrent excitation, a pattern likely to be typical of cortex.",
  "source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match",
  "replication_evidence_dois": [
    "10.7554/elife.54875",
    "10.7554/elife.71263"
  ],
  "effect_size_source_sentence": null
}
source_refs
[
  "paper:paper-73146022940d"
]
evidence_refs
[
  {
    "ref": "paper:paper-73146022940d"
  }
]
source_policy
{
  "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
  "notes": [
    "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
    "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
  ],
  "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
  "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
}

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Replication

No replications yet

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.