- claim_text
When compared with monkey PFC vibrotactile delayed-discrimination data, a randomly connected chaotic recurrent network performs the task and matches certain aspects of the data 'surprisingly' well, comparing favorably with a fine-tuned line-attractor model.
- raw_fields
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.02.002",
"claim": "When compared with monkey PFC vibrotactile delayed-discrimination data, a randomly connected chaotic recurrent network performs the task and matches certain aspects of the data 'surprisingly' well, comparing favorably with a fine-tuned line-attractor model.",
"cite_key": "Barak2013",
"evidence": "Comparison of three classes of recurrent-network model (organized line attractor, partially trained, random chaotic) against monkey PFC vibrotactile delayed-discrimination data.",
"effect_size": "qualitative",
"text_access": "abstract_only",
"study_system": "recurrent network models compared to monkey PFC delayed-discrimination data",
"argument_role": "supporting",
"replication_status": "contested",
"claim_source_sentence": "The random network does a surprisingly good job of both performing the task and matching certain aspects of the data.",
"source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match",
"replication_evidence_dois": [
"10.1038/nn.3645",
"10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.024"
],
"effect_size_source_sentence": null
}- source_refs
[
"paper:paper-d24fadcbece7"
]
- evidence_refs
[
{
"ref": "paper:paper-d24fadcbece7"
}
]- source_policy
{
"mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
"notes": [
"Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
"SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
],
"source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
"source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
}