Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
406d42981727Content snapshot
{ "scope": "mouse mPFC and PPC; large-scale recordings during DMS-with-delayed-report task; RNN modelling", "claim_text": "Mice performing a delayed match-to-sample with delayed report task re-use distinct subspaces of neural activity specialized for stimulus processing and memory maintenance, supported by functionally separate clusters in medial prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex; silencing specific clusters in reconstructed RNNs selectively disrupts the corresponding computation.", "raw_fields": { "n": 0, "doi": "10.21203/rs.3.rs-7420993/v1", "claim": "Mice performing a delayed match-to-sample with delayed report task re-use distinct subspaces of neural activity specialized for stimulus processing and memory maintenance, supported by functionally separate clusters in medial prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex; silencing specific clusters in reconstructed RNNs selectively disrupts the corresponding computation.", "cite_key": "Osako2025", "evidence": "", "effect_size": "", "text_access": "abstract_only", "study_system": "mouse mPFC and PPC; large-scale recordings during DMS-with-delayed-report task; RNN modelling", "argument_role": "supporting", "replication_status": "single_lab", "claim_source_sentence": "Here, we show that mice performing a delayed match-to-sample with delayed report (DMS-dr) task reuse subspaces of neural activity that were specialized for stimulus processing and memory maintenance.", "source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match", "replication_evidence_dois": [], "effect_size_source_sentence": "Clustering analyses showed each subspace was supported by a functionally distinct cluster of neurons in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC)." }, "section_id": "section_10", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_10_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": "", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-10-persistent-activity", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_10_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-95be7121924c" ], "source_span": "Here, we show that mice performing a delayed match-to-sample with delayed report (DMS-dr) task reuse subspaces of neural activity that were specialized for stimulus processing and memory maintenance.", "study_system": "mouse mPFC and PPC; large-scale recordings during DMS-with-delayed-report task; RNN modelling", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:paper-95be7121924c" } ], "section_title": "10. Physiological signature II — persistent activity and attractor dynamics supported by E→E recurrence (delay-period activity in mouse PFC/ALM, working memory, head-direction)", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }, "evidence_summary": "", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "replication_status": "single_lab", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-10-persistent-activity", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_10_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }