Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
ba25102dfb0dContent snapshot
{ "scope": "Theory (mapped to canonical cortical microcircuit)", "claim_text": "Recurrent Predictive Learning (RPL), a recurrent joint-embedding predictive architecture, computes prediction errors only in latent representation space (not input space) and learns sequence representations that resemble successor-like codes reported in human V1 and abstract sequence codes reported in macaque PFC — a circuit-centric theory framework that can be mapped onto canonical cortical microcircuits.", "raw_fields": { "n": 0, "doi": "10.1101/2025.11.25.690220", "claim": "Recurrent Predictive Learning (RPL), a recurrent joint-embedding predictive architecture, computes prediction errors only in latent representation space (not input space) and learns sequence representations that resemble successor-like codes reported in human V1 and abstract sequence codes reported in macaque PFC — a circuit-centric theory framework that can be mapped onto canonical cortical microcircuits.", "cite_key": "Mohammadi2025", "evidence": "JEPA-style theoretical model; representation comparisons with human V1 and macaque PFC; mapping to canonical microcircuit.", "effect_size": "model learns successor-like sequence representations matching human V1 and macaque PFC patterns", "text_access": "abstract_only", "study_system": "Theory (mapped to canonical cortical microcircuit)", "argument_role": "supporting", "replication_status": "theory", "claim_source_sentence": "Specifically, we introduce recurrent predictive learning (RPL), a recurrent joint-embedding predictive architecture inspired by self-supervised machine learning, that learns abstract representations of object identity and their dynamics and predicts future object motion. Crucially, the model learns sequence representations that resemble successor-like representations observed in the primary visual cortex of humans.", "source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match", "replication_evidence_dois": [], "effect_size_source_sentence": "the model learns sequence representations that resemble successor-like representations observed in the primary visual cortex of humans." }, "section_id": "section_16", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": "model learns successor-like sequence representations matching human V1 and macaque PFC patterns", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-16-synthesis", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-fbd1daca6501" ], "source_span": "Specifically, we introduce recurrent predictive learning (RPL), a recurrent joint-embedding predictive architecture inspired by self-supervised machine learning, that learns abstract representations of object identity and their dynamics and predicts future object motion. Crucially, the model learns sequence representations that resemble successor-like representations observed in the primary visual cortex of humans.", "study_system": "Theory (mapped to canonical cortical microcircuit)", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:paper-fbd1daca6501" } ], "section_title": "16. Synthesis — which computational claims the mouse-cortex E→E empirical record actually supports, where the bottleneck observations are, and what an inhibition-free, single-species, basic-research analytic framing misses", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }, "evidence_summary": "JEPA-style theoretical model; representation comparisons with human V1 and macaque PFC; mapping to canonical microcircuit.", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "replication_status": "theory", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-16-synthesis", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }