Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live f749855b6b8a
    5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "scope": "mouse ALM and S1 cortex; in vivo PV photostimulation with simultaneous PC/PV recordings and four-population network modeling",
      "claim_text": "In mouse ALM layer 5 and barrel cortex S1, optogenetic stimulation of PV interneurons paradoxically reduces their activity (as expected for an inhibition-stabilized regime), but in ALM layer 2/3 it does not; two-population models cannot capture the layer-specific pattern, and four-population (PC, PV, SOM, VIP) models reproduce it only when recurrent excitation is not too strong — arguing that the paradoxical effect alone is not proof of inhibition-stabilization.",
      "raw_fields": {
        "n": 0,
        "doi": "10.7554/elife.49967",
        "claim": "In mouse ALM layer 5 and barrel cortex S1, optogenetic stimulation of PV interneurons paradoxically reduces their activity (as expected for an inhibition-stabilized regime), but in ALM layer 2/3 it does not; two-population models cannot capture the layer-specific pattern, and four-population (PC, PV, SOM, VIP) models reproduce it only when recurrent excitation is not too strong — arguing that the paradoxical effect alone is not proof of inhibition-stabilization.",
        "cite_key": "Mahrach2020",
        "evidence": "Two-population models cannot explain the results. Four-population networks with V1-like architecture account for the data in ALM layer 2/3 and layer 5. In both four-population models, the paradoxical effect implies not too strong recurrent excitation. It is not evidence for stabilization by inhibition.",
        "effect_size": "",
        "text_access": "fulltext",
        "study_system": "mouse ALM and S1 cortex; in vivo PV photostimulation with simultaneous PC/PV recordings and four-population network modeling",
        "argument_role": "supporting",
        "replication_status": "single_lab",
        "claim_source_sentence": "In ALM layer five and S1, the PV response is paradoxical: photoexcitation reduces their activity. This is not the case in ALM layer 2/3.",
        "source_provenance_status": "ok",
        "replication_evidence_dois": [],
        "effect_size_source_sentence": null
      },
      "section_id": "section_10",
      "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_10_evidence_package.json",
      "effect_size": "",
      "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence",
      "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-10-persistent-activity",
      "source_kind": "review_finding",
      "source_path": "evidence/section_10_evidence_package.json",
      "source_refs": [
        "paper:paper-38fe71bdf9b6"
      ],
      "source_span": "In ALM layer five and S1, the PV response is paradoxical: photoexcitation reduces their activity. This is not the case in ALM layer 2/3.",
      "study_system": "mouse ALM and S1 cortex; in vivo PV photostimulation with simultaneous PC/PV recordings and four-population network modeling",
      "evidence_refs": [
        {
          "ref": "paper:paper-38fe71bdf9b6"
        }
      ],
      "section_title": "10. Physiological signature II — persistent activity and attractor dynamics supported by E→E recurrence (delay-period activity in mouse PFC/ALM, working memory, head-direction)",
      "source_policy": {
        "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
        "notes": [
          "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
          "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
        ],
        "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
        "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
      },
      "evidence_summary": "Two-population models cannot explain the results. Four-population networks with V1-like architecture account for the data in ALM layer 2/3 and layer 5. In both four-population models, the paradoxical effect implies not too strong recurrent excitation. It is not evidence for stabilization by inhibition.",
      "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9",
      "replication_status": "single_lab",
      "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9",
      "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-10-persistent-activity",
      "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_10_evidence_package.json",
      "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
      "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
    }