Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
cb92ae31cdbdContent snapshot
{ "scope": "loosely balanced supralinear excitatory-inhibitory recurrent network (SSSN) compared against monkey and rodent sensory-cortex variability data", "claim_text": "Stimulus-dependent quenching of correlated variability across cortex is best explained by fluctuations about a single stimulus-driven attractor in a loosely balanced supralinear excitatory–inhibitory network (stochastic SSSN), rather than by multi-stable attractors or chaotic dynamics, with stimulus drive strengthening effective recurrence and shifting balance toward inhibitory feedback.", "raw_fields": { "n": 0, "doi": "10.1016/j.neuron.2018.04.017", "claim": "Stimulus-dependent quenching of correlated variability across cortex is best explained by fluctuations about a single stimulus-driven attractor in a loosely balanced supralinear excitatory–inhibitory network (stochastic SSSN), rather than by multi-stable attractors or chaotic dynamics, with stimulus drive strengthening effective recurrence and shifting balance toward inhibitory feedback.", "cite_key": "Hennequin2018", "evidence": "Provides an alternative single-attractor regime that competes with multi-attractor models for explaining mouse-cortex variability statistics.", "effect_size": "qualitative", "text_access": "abstract_only", "study_system": "loosely balanced supralinear excitatory-inhibitory recurrent network (SSSN) compared against monkey and rodent sensory-cortex variability data", "argument_role": "supporting", "replication_status": "independently_replicated", "claim_source_sentence": "Here we show that a qualitatively different dynamical regime, involving fluctuations about a single, stimulus-driven attractor in a loosely balanced excitatory-inhibitory network (the stochastic \"stabilized supralinear network\"), best explains these modulations.", "source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match", "replication_evidence_dois": [ "10.7554/elife.54875", "10.1523/eneuro.0459-24.2025" ], "effect_size_source_sentence": null }, "section_id": "section_13", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": "qualitative", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-818c0c4864de" ], "source_span": "Here we show that a qualitatively different dynamical regime, involving fluctuations about a single, stimulus-driven attractor in a loosely balanced excitatory-inhibitory network (the stochastic \"stabilized supralinear network\"), best explains these modulations.", "study_system": "loosely balanced supralinear excitatory-inhibitory recurrent network (SSSN) compared against monkey and rodent sensory-cortex variability data", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:paper-818c0c4864de" } ], "section_title": "13. Attractor-network models — Hopfield, ring, line, bump; what each model requires of the cortical E→E matrix and what the mouse empirical record provides", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }, "evidence_summary": "Provides an alternative single-attractor regime that competes with multi-attractor models for explaining mouse-cortex variability statistics.", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "replication_status": "independently_replicated", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }