Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live 99c0612d4b27
    5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "scope": "Mouse V1 layer 2/3, pulvinar, VIP and SOM interneurons; two-photon imaging + circuit manipulation",
      "claim_text": "Unexpected visual stimuli selectively amplify the responses of the V1 layer 2/3 neurons most tuned to that stimulus — a feature-selective prediction-error signal rather than a generic surprise signal.",
      "raw_fields": {
        "n": null,
        "doi": "10.1038/s41586-024-07851-w",
        "claim": "Unexpected visual stimuli selectively amplify the responses of the V1 layer 2/3 neurons most tuned to that stimulus — a feature-selective prediction-error signal rather than a generic surprise signal.",
        "cite_key": "Furutachi2024",
        "evidence": "Two-photon imaging in mouse V1 with optogenetic and pharmacogenetic manipulation; selective amplification depends on pulvinar input and VIP-mediated disinhibition of a specific SOM subpopulation.",
        "effect_size": "Selective amplification of stimulus-tuned L2/3 neurons (mechanism: pulvinar → VIP → SOM disinhibition gating excitatory pulvinar input)",
        "text_access": "fulltext",
        "study_system": "Mouse V1 layer 2/3, pulvinar, VIP and SOM interneurons; two-photon imaging + circuit manipulation",
        "argument_role": "supporting",
        "replication_status": "independently_replicated",
        "claim_source_sentence": "A plausible scenario for how the pulvinar and neocortical VIP neurons interact to mediate prediction-error signals may therefore involve pulvinar input activating VIP neurons in V1, which in turn boost pyramidal neuron responses to unexpected visual stimuli through the VIP–SOM disinhibitory circuit.",
        "source_provenance_status": "ok",
        "replication_evidence_dois": [
          "10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109772",
          "10.1093/cercor/bhad163"
        ],
        "effect_size_source_sentence": "In response to prediction errors, VIP neurons inhibit a specific subpopulation of somatostatin-expressing inhibitory interneurons that gate excitatory pulvinar input to V1, resulting in specific pulvinar-driven response amplification of the most stimulus-selective neurons in V1."
      },
      "section_id": "section_14",
      "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
      "effect_size": "Selective amplification of stimulus-tuned L2/3 neurons (mechanism: pulvinar → VIP → SOM disinhibition gating excitatory pulvinar input)",
      "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence",
      "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding",
      "source_kind": "review_finding",
      "source_path": "evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
      "source_refs": [
        "paper:paper-41aa556ea384"
      ],
      "source_span": "A plausible scenario for how the pulvinar and neocortical VIP neurons interact to mediate prediction-error signals may therefore involve pulvinar input activating VIP neurons in V1, which in turn boost pyramidal neuron responses to unexpected visual stimuli through the VIP–SOM disinhibitory circuit.",
      "study_system": "Mouse V1 layer 2/3, pulvinar, VIP and SOM interneurons; two-photon imaging + circuit manipulation",
      "evidence_refs": [
        {
          "ref": "paper:paper-41aa556ea384"
        }
      ],
      "section_title": "14. Predictive-coding and dynamical-systems accounts — the role of recurrent excitatory feedback in error signalling, state estimation, and reservoir computing, evaluated against mouse data",
      "source_policy": {
        "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
        "notes": [
          "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
          "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
        ],
        "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
        "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
      },
      "evidence_summary": "Two-photon imaging in mouse V1 with optogenetic and pharmacogenetic manipulation; selective amplification depends on pulvinar input and VIP-mediated disinhibition of a specific SOM subpopulation.",
      "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9",
      "replication_status": "independently_replicated",
      "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9",
      "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding",
      "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
      "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
      "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
    }