Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live 3f4c755155c5
    5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "scope": "Awake mouse visual cortex, 2P calcium imaging",
      "claim_text": "A new dynamic Zebra-noise stimulus combined with a wavelet-based analysis model enables rapid characterization of position, orientation, size, spatial frequency, drift rate and direction tuning for thousands of mouse-V1 neurons in just five minutes of stimulus (repeated three times) using two-photon calcium imaging — significantly extending the throughput envelope of feature-tuning measurements in mouse cortex.",
      "raw_fields": {
        "n": 0,
        "doi": "10.1167/jov.26.1.1",
        "claim": "A new dynamic Zebra-noise stimulus combined with a wavelet-based analysis model enables rapid characterization of position, orientation, size, spatial frequency, drift rate and direction tuning for thousands of mouse-V1 neurons in just five minutes of stimulus (repeated three times) using two-photon calcium imaging — significantly extending the throughput envelope of feature-tuning measurements in mouse cortex.",
        "cite_key": "Skriabine2026",
        "evidence": "Stimulus + wavelet model comparison vs traditional stimuli; thousand-neuron-scale tuning measurements in mouse V1.",
        "effect_size": "thousands of neurons tuned across 6 stimulus dimensions in 5 min × 3 repeats",
        "text_access": "fulltext",
        "study_system": "Awake mouse visual cortex, 2P calcium imaging",
        "argument_role": "supporting",
        "replication_status": "single-study-methods",
        "claim_source_sentence": "The method proved efficient, requiring only 5 minutes of stimulus (repeated three times) to characterize the tuning of thousands of neurons across visual areas.",
        "source_provenance_status": "ok",
        "replication_evidence_dois": [],
        "effect_size_source_sentence": "The method proved efficient, requiring only 5 minutes of stimulus (repeated three times) to characterize the tuning of thousands of neurons across visual areas."
      },
      "section_id": "section_16",
      "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json",
      "effect_size": "thousands of neurons tuned across 6 stimulus dimensions in 5 min × 3 repeats",
      "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence",
      "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-16-synthesis",
      "source_kind": "review_finding",
      "source_path": "evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json",
      "source_refs": [
        "paper:paper-e3ab0a91f3c5"
      ],
      "source_span": "The method proved efficient, requiring only 5 minutes of stimulus (repeated three times) to characterize the tuning of thousands of neurons across visual areas.",
      "study_system": "Awake mouse visual cortex, 2P calcium imaging",
      "evidence_refs": [
        {
          "ref": "paper:paper-e3ab0a91f3c5"
        }
      ],
      "section_title": "16. Synthesis — which computational claims the mouse-cortex E→E empirical record actually supports, where the bottleneck observations are, and what an inhibition-free, single-species, basic-research analytic framing misses",
      "source_policy": {
        "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
        "notes": [
          "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
          "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
        ],
        "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
        "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
      },
      "evidence_summary": "Stimulus + wavelet model comparison vs traditional stimuli; thousand-neuron-scale tuning measurements in mouse V1.",
      "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9",
      "replication_status": "single-study-methods",
      "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9",
      "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-16-synthesis",
      "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json",
      "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
      "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
    }