Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
7d15e805d4eaContent snapshot
{ "scope": "rhesus macaque FEF and dlPFC, two animals", "claim_text": "Memory cells in macaque FEF and dlPFC sustain firing for distinct, cell-specific durations during long delays, producing dynamics more complex than canonical bump-attractor models but more constrained than fully heterogeneous models.", "raw_fields": { "n": 2, "doi": "10.1093/cercor/bhab079", "claim": "Memory cells in macaque FEF and dlPFC sustain firing for distinct, cell-specific durations during long delays, producing dynamics more complex than canonical bump-attractor models but more constrained than fully heterogeneous models.", "cite_key": "Papadimitriou2021", "evidence": "Long-delay (5–15 s) single-unit recordings in dorsolateral PFC and frontal eye fields of two macaques during oculomotor delayed-response.", "effect_size": "delay duration 5–15 s", "text_access": "abstract_only", "study_system": "rhesus macaque FEF and dlPFC, two animals", "argument_role": "supporting", "replication_status": "contested", "claim_source_sentence": "These dynamics are more complex than the dynamics of a canonical bump attractor network model (either decaying or nondecaying) but more constrained than the dynamics of fully heterogeneous memory models.", "source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match", "replication_evidence_dois": [ "10.1038/nn.3645", "10.1162/0899766054026660" ], "effect_size_source_sentence": "We recorded from neurons in the frontal eye fields and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of 2 macaques during long (5-15 s) memory periods." }, "section_id": "section_13", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": "delay duration 5–15 s", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-e929cf9acfc8" ], "source_span": "These dynamics are more complex than the dynamics of a canonical bump attractor network model (either decaying or nondecaying) but more constrained than the dynamics of fully heterogeneous memory models.", "study_system": "rhesus macaque FEF and dlPFC, two animals", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:paper-e929cf9acfc8" } ], "section_title": "13. Attractor-network models — Hopfield, ring, line, bump; what each model requires of the cortical E→E matrix and what the mouse empirical record provides", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }, "evidence_summary": "Long-delay (5–15 s) single-unit recordings in dorsolateral PFC and frontal eye fields of two macaques during oculomotor delayed-response.", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "replication_status": "contested", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_13_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }