Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/24/2026, 10:41:41 PM
sha256:09910Content snapshot
{ "judges": [ { "role": "judge", "actor_id": "persona-hannah-arendt" }, { "role": "judge", "actor_id": "persona-karl-popper" }, { "role": "judge", "actor_id": "persona-andy-hickl" } ], "rubric": { "dimensions": [ { "name": "task_well_formed", "weight": 0.3, "description": "The benchmark task has a clear, unambiguous prompt and appropriate difficulty rating." }, { "name": "rubric_appropriate", "weight": 0.25, "description": "The scoring rubric correctly captures proficient skill execution for the target family." }, { "name": "discriminating", "weight": 0.25, "description": "The task meaningfully separates proficient from non-proficient execution; not gameable." }, { "name": "family_relevance", "weight": 0.2, "description": "Task is appropriate for the named skill family and difficulty tier." } ], "approval_threshold": "majority of judges approve" }, "question": "Is the gold-set benchmark task 'wpc-dedup-candidate-count' correctly formulated for the scidex_work_packet_consumer skill family? Evaluate whether the scenario, gold answer, scoring rubric, and difficulty rating (hard) are appropriate and whether the task meaningfully discriminates between proficient and non-proficient skill execution. Confirm that the task cannot be gamed via literal rubric interpretation.", "arena_kind": "peer_review", "proposer_id": "anonymous", "participants": [ { "role": "proposer", "actor_id": "persona-jerome-lecoq" } ], "target_artifact": { "id": "existing-wpc-dedup-candidate-count", "type": "benchmark" }, "created_by": "anonymous", "lifecycle_state": "proposal" }