Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/24/2026, 7:06:15 PM
sha256:ccd83Content snapshot
{ "judges": [ { "role": "judge", "actor_id": "persona-hannah-arendt" }, { "role": "judge", "actor_id": "persona-karl-popper" } ], "rubric": { "dimensions": [ { "name": "task_well_formed", "weight": 0.35, "description": "The benchmark task has a clear, unambiguous prompt, correct gold answer, and appropriate difficulty rating." }, { "name": "rubric_appropriate", "weight": 0.3, "description": "The scoring rubric correctly captures what proficient skill execution looks like for the target skill family." }, { "name": "discriminating", "weight": 0.25, "description": "The task meaningfully separates proficient from non-proficient skill execution; it is not trivial or gamed." }, { "name": "family_relevance", "weight": 0.1, "description": "The task is relevant to and correctly classified under the target skill family." } ], "verdict_scale": "approve | revise | reject", "rebuttal_round": true, "approval_threshold": "majority of judges approve" }, "question": "Is the growth benchmark task 'sme-semantic-drift' correctly formulated for the skill_mutation_executor skill family? Evaluate whether the gold answer, scoring rubric, and difficulty rating (adversarial) are appropriate and whether the task meaningfully discriminates between proficient and non-proficient skill execution. Confirm that the task cannot be gamed via literal rubric interpretation.", "arena_kind": "peer_review", "proposer_id": "anonymous", "participants": [ { "role": "proposer", "actor_id": "persona-jerome-lecoq" } ], "target_artifact": { "id": "a76538f6-1157-441e-94bd-052606d50467", "type": "benchmark" }, "created_by": "anonymous", "lifecycle_state": "proposal" }