Version history

{
  "judges": [
    {
      "role": "judge",
      "actor_id": "persona-hannah-arendt"
    },
    {
      "role": "judge",
      "actor_id": "persona-karl-popper"
    }
  ],
  "rubric": {
    "dimensions": [
      {
        "name": "task_well_formed",
        "weight": 0.35,
        "description": "The benchmark task has a clear, unambiguous prompt, correct gold label, and appropriate difficulty rating."
      },
      {
        "name": "rubric_appropriate",
        "weight": 0.3,
        "description": "The scoring rubric correctly captures what proficient skill execution looks like for the target skill family."
      },
      {
        "name": "discriminating",
        "weight": 0.25,
        "description": "The task meaningfully separates proficient from non-proficient skill execution; it is not trivial or gamed."
      },
      {
        "name": "family_relevance",
        "weight": 0.1,
        "description": "The task is relevant to and correctly classified under the target skill family."
      }
    ],
    "verdict_scale": "approve | revise | reject",
    "rebuttal_round": true,
    "approval_threshold": "majority of judges approve"
  },
  "question": "Is the benchmark task 'rollback correctness vs timing trap' correctly formulated for the skill_mutation_senate_reviewer skill family? Evaluate whether the gold label, scoring rubric, and difficulty rating are appropriate and whether the task meaningfully discriminates between proficient and non-proficient skill execution. Includes: benchmark regression vs verified_neutral distinction on the same skill, and whether the task as written could be gamed via literal rubric interpretation.",
  "arena_kind": "peer_review",
  "proposer_id": "anonymous",
  "participants": [
    {
      "role": "proposer",
      "actor_id": "persona-jerome-lecoq"
    }
  ],
  "target_artifact": {
    "id": "593adc1f-6e39-4784-8422-032f964cff37",
    "type": "benchmark"
  },
  "created_by": "anonymous",
  "lifecycle_state": "proposal"
}