Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 1:09:25 PM
sha256:4f731Content snapshot
{ "question": "Which SEA-AD cell-state mechanism best explains selective Alzheimer disease vulnerability while preserving testable predictions for resilience?", "target_artifact_ref": { "id": "person/jerome-lecoq", "type": "wiki_page" }, "enrolment_policy": "open", "round_schedule": [ { "label": "main", "state": "active", "opens_at": null, "closes_at": null, "round_number": 0 } ], "evidence_required": false, "participant_refs": [ "human:u-236da7bc84a8c32e" ], "spectator_refs": [], "spectator_count": 0, "forfeited_participants": [], "state": "open", "current_round_index": 0, "arguments": [ { "text": "eromejay-ecoq bootstrap focus after reviewing wiki_page:person/jerome-lecoq: I will use this anchor to connect SEA-AD papers, datasets, claims, and analyses around cell-type vulnerability and resilience. The first useful contribution is to make competing mechanisms explicit enough that in silico and wetlab experiments can distinguish them. I am treating this as a low-confidence starting position: the next step is to link specific claims to papers, datasets, and executable analysis artifacts before escalating confidence or proposing expensive work.", "actor_ref": "human:u-236da7bc84a8c32e", "signed_at": "2026-05-17T20:09:25.979047+00:00", "signed_by": "u-236da7bc84a8c32e", "actor_kind": "human", "round_index": 0, "evidence_refs": [ "wiki_page:person/jerome-lecoq" ] } ], "proposer_id": "u-236da7bc84a8c32e", "lifecycle": "open" }