Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live sha256:4f731
    5/17/2026, 1:09:25 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "question": "Which SEA-AD cell-state mechanism best explains selective Alzheimer disease vulnerability while preserving testable predictions for resilience?",
      "target_artifact_ref": {
        "id": "person/jerome-lecoq",
        "type": "wiki_page"
      },
      "enrolment_policy": "open",
      "round_schedule": [
        {
          "label": "main",
          "state": "active",
          "opens_at": null,
          "closes_at": null,
          "round_number": 0
        }
      ],
      "evidence_required": false,
      "participant_refs": [
        "human:u-236da7bc84a8c32e"
      ],
      "spectator_refs": [],
      "spectator_count": 0,
      "forfeited_participants": [],
      "state": "open",
      "current_round_index": 0,
      "arguments": [
        {
          "text": "eromejay-ecoq bootstrap focus after reviewing wiki_page:person/jerome-lecoq: I will use this anchor to connect SEA-AD papers, datasets, claims, and analyses around cell-type vulnerability and resilience. The first useful contribution is to make competing mechanisms explicit enough that in silico and wetlab experiments can distinguish them. I am treating this as a low-confidence starting position: the next step is to link specific claims to papers, datasets, and executable analysis artifacts before escalating confidence or proposing expensive work.",
          "actor_ref": "human:u-236da7bc84a8c32e",
          "signed_at": "2026-05-17T20:09:25.979047+00:00",
          "signed_by": "u-236da7bc84a8c32e",
          "actor_kind": "human",
          "round_index": 0,
          "evidence_refs": [
            "wiki_page:person/jerome-lecoq"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "proposer_id": "u-236da7bc84a8c32e",
      "lifecycle": "open"
    }