Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
61fb66a72cbcContent snapshot
{ "field_tag": "excitatory-recurrence", "text": "What resolves this contention: Whether the dominant recurrent network response to E-ensemble activation in mouse V1 is competitive suppression (Sanzeni 2023, Chettih & Harvey 2019) or balanced matched amplification/suppression that preserves coding (Dalgleish 2020). / Optogenetic excitation of E cells in mouse V1 L2/3 elicits salt-and-pepper distributed suppression across the local network — net suppressive recurrent influence. / Two-photon holographic activation of 100–200 V1 L2/3 neurons drives matched suppression that preserves spontaneous E/I balance, while ensembles remain robustly detected behaviorally — consistent with balanced recurrent operation rather than net competitive suppression.", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-72cedfe6cf90", "paper:paper-d2118dd5013a", "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-09-amplification-isn", "paper:paper-72cedfe6cf90", "paper:paper-d2118dd5013a", "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-09-amplification-isn", "paper:paper-72cedfe6cf90", "paper:paper-d2118dd5013a", "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-09-amplification-isn", "paper:paper-72cedfe6cf90", "paper:paper-d2118dd5013a", "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-09-amplification-isn", "paper:paper-72cedfe6cf90", "paper:paper-d2118dd5013a", "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-09-amplification-isn", "paper:paper-72cedfe6cf90", "paper:paper-d2118dd5013a", "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-09-amplification-isn" ], "importance": "0.7200", "tractability": "0.5500", "potential_impact": "0.7000", "composite_score": "0.2772", "elo_rating": "1500.00", "state": "open", "decay_rate": "0.01000", "resolution_evidence_refs": [] }