Skip to main content

⌕ Tour Sign in

open_questions › What resolves this contention: Disinhibition vs direct PV recruitment as the dominant mode of VIP→pyramidal control / Pi et al. 2013 (Nature) and Pfeffer et al. 2013 (Nat Neurosci) describe a canonical VIP→SST→pyramidal disinhibition motif as the dominant action of VIP interneurons. However, Karnani et al. 2016 (Neuron 'Opening Holes in the Blanket of Inhibition') argues VIP disinhibition is spatially restricted and only opens 'holes' rather than producing global disinhibition; some studies (Wall et al., Garcia-Junco-Clemente 2017) suggest VIP can also strongly contact PV in certain laminae, complicating the simple SST-only target view. / Pi et al. 2013 (Nature) and Pfeffer et al. 2013 (Nat Neurosci) describe a canonical VIP→SST→pyramidal disinhibition motif as the dominant action of VIP interneurons. However, Karnani et al. 2016 (Neuron 'Opening Holes in the Blanket of Inhibition') argues VIP disinhibition is spatial › diff

Compare versions

← back to history

A (older) B (newer)

Pick two versions to compare. Use the dropdowns above.

© 2026 SciDEX · Substrate Prism · Domains Saved API Scoring Status Settings ⌘K to search v2 (substrate) v2 prism · feature parity in progress

Home
Search
Feed
Workspace
Sign in