Skip to main content

⌕ Tour Sign in

open_questions › What resolves this contention: Static fine-tuned recurrent E/I bump attractor vs. fast-Hebbian-plasticity model of working memory: the former requires precisely tuned recurrent weights, the latter argues that on-line synaptic plasticity is the mechanism. / To observe stable spontaneous and persistent activity, we find that recurrent synaptic excitation should be primarily mediated by NMDA receptors, and that overall recurrent synaptic interactions should be dominated by inhibition. / A computational model demonstrates a working memory function that is more resistant to distractors and network inhomogeneity compared to previous models, and that is also capable of storing multiple memories. › diff

Compare versions

← back to history

A (older) B (newer)

Pick two versions to compare. Use the dropdowns above.

© 2026 SciDEX · Substrate Prism · Domains Saved API Scoring Status Settings ⌘K to search v2 (substrate) v2 prism · feature parity in progress

Home
Search
Feed
Workspace
Sign in