Version history

{
  "field_tag": "excitatory-recurrence",
  "text": "What resolves this contention: Static fine-tuned recurrent E/I bump attractor vs. fast-Hebbian-plasticity model of working memory: the former requires precisely tuned recurrent weights, the latter argues that on-line synaptic plasticity is the mechanism. / To observe stable spontaneous and persistent activity, we find that recurrent synaptic excitation should be primarily mediated by NMDA receptors, and that overall recurrent synaptic interactions should be dominated by inhibition. / A computational model demonstrates a working memory function that is more resistant to distractors and network inhomogeneity compared to previous models, and that is also capable of storing multiple memories.",
  "source_refs": [
    "paper:paper-33cb9e915244",
    "paper:paper-6244370d231f",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models",
    "paper:paper-33cb9e915244",
    "paper:paper-6244370d231f",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models",
    "paper:paper-33cb9e915244",
    "paper:paper-6244370d231f",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models"
  ],
  "importance": "0.7200",
  "tractability": "0.5500",
  "potential_impact": "0.7000",
  "composite_score": "0.2772",
  "elo_rating": "1500.00",
  "state": "open",
  "decay_rate": "0.01000",
  "resolution_evidence_refs": []
}