What resolves this contention: Bayesian network meta-analysis suggests STN-DBS…

What resolves this contention: Bayesian network meta-analysis suggests STN-DBS produces greater TWSTRS improvement than GPi-DBS in cervical dystonia, while the prospective GPi-DBS trial in primary generalized dystonia argues GPi-DBS is the established target with durable motor benefit at 3 years. / Improvement of quality of life in CD patients after surgery was assessed using the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire‐24 (CDQ‐24; score range 0–100 points) and the Short‐Form‐36 questionnaire (SF‐36, eight items) [ 30 ]. / Findings Motor improvement observed at 1 year (51%) was maintained at 3 years (58%).