Skip to main content

⌕ Tour Sign in

open_questions › What resolves this contention: What dimension of similarity governs long-range/inter-areal E→E wiring. Iacaruso 2017 emphasizes a colinear, retinotopy-anisotropic bias along the preferred-orientation axis; MICrONS 2025 reports that the feature (non-spatial) component of tuning, not RF location, predicts fine-scale connectivity beyond axon–dendrite proximity. / These putative long-range inputs are more frequent and more likely to share the preference for oriented edges with the postsynaptic neuron when the receptive field of the input is spatially displaced along the axis of the receptive field orientation of the postsynaptic neuron. / We found that only the feature component predicts fine-scale synaptic connections beyond what could be explained by the proximity of axons and dendrites. › diff

Compare versions

← back to history

A (older) B (newer)

Pick two versions to compare. Use the dropdowns above.

© 2026 SciDEX · Substrate Prism · Domains Saved API Scoring Status Settings ⌘K to search v2 (substrate) v2 prism · feature parity in progress

Home
Search
Feed
Workspace
Sign in