open
What resolves this contention: PSD-95 KO data argue brief MD's structural effect on adult V1 spines depends only on a single molecule's loss (silent-synapse persistence), while higher-visual-area imaging shows MD effects vary across visual areas and across deprived-/open-eye contributions — implying area- and molecule-specific gates on the same canonical OD plasticity model. / Under basal conditions, spine formation and elimination ratios were similar between PSD-95 knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice. / OD shifts following MD were greatest in LM and smallest in AL and PM; in LM and AL, these shifts were mediated primarily through a reduction of deprived-eye responses, in V1b and LM through an increase in response through the non-deprived eye.
Asked
May 16, 2026
Updated
May 17, 2026

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Replication

No replications yet

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.