Skip to main content

⌕ Tour Sign in

open_questions › What resolves this contention: Whether substituting an expected stimulus with a novel one elicits a prediction-error response in mouse V1; one study reports a sustained firing increase, another reports no significant prediction-error response to substitution. / We find increased neural activity at the time an expected, but omitted, stimulus would have occurred but no significant prediction error responses following an unexpected stimulus substitution. / Substituting a novel stimulus for a familiar one led to increases in firing that persisted for at least 300 ms. › diff

Compare versions

← back to history

A (older) B (newer)

Pick two versions to compare. Use the dropdowns above.

© 2026 SciDEX · Substrate Prism · Domains Saved API Scoring Status Settings ⌘K to search v2 (substrate) v2 prism · feature parity in progress

Home
Search
Feed
Workspace
Sign in