Version history

{
  "field_tag": "excitatory-recurrence",
  "text": "What resolves this contention: Whether substituting an expected stimulus with a novel one elicits a prediction-error response in mouse V1; one study reports a sustained firing increase, another reports no significant prediction-error response to substitution. / We find increased neural activity at the time an expected, but omitted, stimulus would have occurred but no significant prediction error responses following an unexpected stimulus substitution. / Substituting a novel stimulus for a familiar one led to increases in firing that persisted for at least 300 ms.",
  "source_refs": [
    "paper:paper-805e7b60808f",
    "paper:paper-d6acd7459360",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-11-pattern-completion",
    "paper:paper-805e7b60808f",
    "paper:paper-d6acd7459360",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-11-pattern-completion",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding",
    "paper:paper-805e7b60808f",
    "paper:paper-d6acd7459360",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-11-pattern-completion",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding",
    "paper:paper-805e7b60808f",
    "paper:paper-d6acd7459360",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-11-pattern-completion",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding",
    "paper:paper-805e7b60808f",
    "paper:paper-d6acd7459360",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-11-pattern-completion",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding",
    "paper:paper-805e7b60808f",
    "paper:paper-d6acd7459360",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-11-pattern-completion",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding"
  ],
  "importance": "0.7200",
  "tractability": "0.5500",
  "potential_impact": "0.7000",
  "composite_score": "0.2772",
  "elo_rating": "1500.00",
  "state": "open",
  "decay_rate": "0.01000",
  "resolution_evidence_refs": []
}