Skip to main content

⌕ Tour Sign in

open_questions › What resolves this contention: Both studies argue that mouse ALM preparatory activity is not maintained by local recurrence alone but by a multi-region loop; they nonetheless implicate different external partners (thalamus vs. cerebellar nuclei). The relative contributions of thalamic versus cerebellar input to maintaining cortical persistent activity — and whether they act in parallel, serially, or as redundant supports — remain to be quantitatively dissected. / Photoinhibition of the thalamus caused a short-latency and near-complete collapse of ALM activity. / The silencing of frontal cortex activity abolished preparatory activity in the cerebellar nuclei, and fastigial activity was necessary to maintain cortical preparatory activity. › diff

Compare versions

← back to history

A (older) B (newer)

Pick two versions to compare. Use the dropdowns above.

© 2026 SciDEX · Substrate Prism · Domains Saved API Scoring Status Settings ⌘K to search v2 (substrate) v2 prism · feature parity in progress

Home
Search
Feed
Workspace
Sign in