Version history

{
  "field_tag": "excitatory-recurrence",
  "text": "What resolves this contention: Whether single-area monkey PFC delay activity is well described by a single bump-attractor (diffusing/decaying) model: Wimmer et al. argue yes; Spaak et al. find cell-specific turn-off times that exceed canonical bump-attractor dynamics and suggest multiple parallel attractors instead. / Our results support a diffusing bump representation for spatial working memory instantiated in persistent prefrontal activity. / These dynamics are more complex than the dynamics of a canonical bump attractor network model (either decaying or nondecaying) but more constrained than the dynamics of fully heterogeneous memory models.",
  "source_refs": [
    "paper:paper-e929cf9acfc8",
    "paper:paper-f7b4b82f9b06",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models",
    "paper:paper-e929cf9acfc8",
    "paper:paper-f7b4b82f9b06",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models",
    "paper:paper-e929cf9acfc8",
    "paper:paper-f7b4b82f9b06",
    "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-13-attractor-network-models"
  ],
  "importance": "0.7200",
  "tractability": "0.5500",
  "potential_impact": "0.7000",
  "composite_score": "0.2772",
  "elo_rating": "1500.00",
  "state": "open",
  "decay_rate": "0.01000",
  "resolution_evidence_refs": []
}