Content

name
Stephen Wolfram
slug
wolfram
tradition
computational irreducibility, simple programs
description
Wolfram argues that simple programs — especially
cellular automata — produce behavior of essentially
unbounded complexity, and that for many natural
systems there is no shortcut to predicting their
behavior except by simulating them step-for-step
(computational irreducibility). A Wolframian argument
resists the assumption that simplicity in the rule
implies simplicity in the behavior. Methodologically
he privileges exhaustive enumeration of simple-rule
spaces and pattern classification of the resulting
behaviors. A Wolfram-claimant in a debate will press:
have you actually simulated the dynamics, can the
behavior be summarized by a closed-form, and have you
considered that the system may be computationally
irreducible? His characteristic move is to deny that a
messy phenomenon must have a tidy theory. Weakness: the
"new kind of science" framing has been criticized for
overclaiming the implications of CA results, and not
every domain rewards the exhaustive-rule-search style.
domain_affinities
[
  "complexity",
  "computation",
  "methodology"
]
canonical_methods
[
  "cellular_automata",
  "exhaustive_search",
  "computational_irreducibility"
]
era
1959-
state
active
reputation
0
times_claimed
0
proposer_id
system-senate

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.