Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live d862f4c69c34
    5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "kind": "infographic",
      "prompt": "Across mouse motor-cortex studies, latent dimensionality is small but stability and criticality regimes are layer- and method-dependent — bears on whether E→E recurrence enforces a single canonical low-dimensional manifold.",
      "provider": "other",
      "raw_fields": {
        "papers": [
          {
            "n": null,
            "doi": "10.64898/2026.01.30.702162",
            "value": "3-7",
            "method": "supervised latent model",
            "metric": "latent variance captured (%)",
            "n_analyzed": null,
            "ci_or_error": null,
            "text_access": "abstract_only",
            "n_definition": "animals (count not in abstract)",
            "scope_region": "motor cortex",
            "study_system": "motor cortex (2D reaching)",
            "taxonomic_level": "broad category",
            "scope_population": "all units",
            "value_source_sentence": "Despite only capturing 3-7% of total variance and spanning two dimensions, this supervised method outperforms other common methods at an offline decoding task, and explains the long-term stability of neural manifolds observed in previous literature.",
            "experimental_conditions": "chronic recordings"
          },
          {
            "n": null,
            "doi": "10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112574",
            "value": ">10,000 neurons; 30,000,000 synapses",
            "method": "biophysical simulation",
            "metric": "model scale (neurons; synapses)",
            "n_analyzed": null,
            "ci_or_error": null,
            "text_access": "abstract_only",
            "n_definition": "model neurons",
            "scope_region": "M1",
            "study_system": "mouse M1 model",
            "taxonomic_level": "subcategory",
            "scope_population": "all cortical cell types",
            "value_source_sentence": "We develop a multiscale, biophysically detailed model of mouse primary motor cortex (M1) with over 10,000 neurons and 30 million synapses.",
            "experimental_conditions": "model"
          },
          {
            "n": null,
            "doi": "10.1152/jn.00061.2020",
            "value": "14",
            "method": "chronic two-photon imaging",
            "metric": "days of recording at criticality",
            "n_analyzed": null,
            "ci_or_error": null,
            "text_access": "abstract_only",
            "n_definition": "days",
            "scope_region": "motor and premotor cortex",
            "study_system": "mouse forelimb motor/premotor cortex",
            "taxonomic_level": "subcategory",
            "scope_population": "L2/3 and L5 pyramidal",
            "value_source_sentence": "In contrast, layer 5 circuits operated away from the critical network state for all 14 days of recording and learning.",
            "experimental_conditions": "lever-press learning"
          }
        ],
        "audit_issues": [
          {
            "dimension": "metric_definition",
            "description": "Row 1: latent variance captured (3–7%). Row 2: model scale (>10,000 neurons; 30,000,000 synapses). Row 3: number of days at criticality (14). These are three unrelated quantities and cannot be plotted on a shared y-axis as a 'grouped bar.'",
            "entries_affected": [
              "10.64898/2026.01.30.702162",
              "10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112574",
              "10.1152/jn.00061.2020"
            ]
          },
          {
            "dimension": "study_system",
            "description": "Row 1 is an analysis of recorded motor-cortex data; row 2 is a biophysical model; row 3 is chronic two-photon imaging of lever-press learning. The studies are about different aspects of motor cortex (decoding, simulation, plasticity timecourse).",
            "entries_affected": [
              "10.64898/2026.01.30.702162",
              "10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112574",
              "10.1152/jn.00061.2020"
            ]
          }
        ],
        "audit_verdict": "REDESIGN",
        "comparison_id": "low_dim_motor_cortex",
        "comparison_name": "Dimensionality and stability of motor-cortex latent manifolds",
        "comparison_type": "convergent evidence",
        "what_it_reveals": "Across mouse motor-cortex studies, latent dimensionality is small but stability and criticality regimes are layer- and method-dependent — bears on whether E→E recurrence enforces a single canonical low-dimensional manifold.",
        "homogeneity_check": {
          "caveats": [
            "Mix of recording, modelling and reaching-task studies; metrics not directly commensurable"
          ],
          "n_definition_uniform": "false",
          "scope_region_uniform": "true",
          "taxonomic_level_uniform": "false",
          "scope_population_uniform": "false"
        },
        "suggested_plot_type": "grouped bar",
        "mandatory_caption_caveats": [
          "Rows report three unrelated quantities (% latent variance, model scale, days at criticality) and do not share a common metric.",
          "Phase 7 writer: REDESIGN verdict — implement as: Either rebuild the figure around a single common metric (e.g., latent dimensionality of M1 across studies) by re-extracting from each paper, or split into three separate panels with distinct y-axes. As currently configured, the comparison is not meaningful."
        ]
      },
      "section_id": "section_14",
      "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
      "target_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding",
      "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence",
      "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-14-predictive-coding",
      "source_path": "evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
      "source_refs": [
        "paper:paper-28cc9cc5cd02",
        "paper:paper-39da47e849b2",
        "paper:paper-6a004d3b2777"
      ],
      "section_title": "14. Predictive-coding and dynamical-systems accounts — the role of recurrent excitatory feedback in error signalling, state estimation, and reservoir computing, evaluated against mouse data",
      "source_policy": {
        "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
        "notes": [
          "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
          "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
        ],
        "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
        "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
      },
      "generation_status": "complete",
      "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9",
      "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json",
      "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
      "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
    }