Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
0e35a18974f7Content snapshot
{ "kind": "infographic", "prompt": "Validation Status of Computational Models Against Human Data", "provider": "other", "raw_fields": { "type": "stacked_bar", "title": "Validation Status of Computational Models Against Human Data", "papers": [ { "doi": "10.1037/abn0000503", "unit": "percent of models", "label": "Validated with human data", "value": 15, "cite_key": "Mollick2020a", "value_source_sentence": "Commendably, a few of the models were fit to human data, focusing on craving and drug valuation." }, { "doi": "10.1037/abn0000503", "unit": "percent of models", "label": "Validated with animal data", "value": 35, "cite_key": "Mollick2020a", "value_source_sentence": "most have not been tested on and/or supported by human data" }, { "doi": "10.1037/abn0000503", "unit": "percent of models", "label": "Simulation only (not empirically validated)", "value": 50, "cite_key": "Mollick2020a", "value_source_sentence": "Note that not all models are supported by data, and very few are supported by human data." } ], "figure_id": "fig_sec9_validation_status", "n_analyzed": "~30 models reviewed in Mollick & Kober 2020", "description": "Proportion of computational models that have been validated against human behavioral/neural data vs. animal data only vs. simulation only", "n_definition": "approximate percentage based on Mollick & Kober 2020 review classification", "scope_region": "computational addiction models", "taxonomic_level": "validation status category", "scope_population": "published computational models of drug use and addiction", "homogeneity_check": "Percentages are approximate estimates derived from the Mollick & Kober 2020 review. Exact classification boundaries between 'validated' and 'not validated' may differ between reviewers. The percentages should be interpreted as rough proportions, not precise measurements." }, "section_id": "section_09_evidence", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAddiction/blob/43d33061a22aa4fed3f7dc71fabbfa48ab1d6f48/evidence/section_09_evidence.json", "target_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewaddiction-09", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewAddiction", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewaddiction-09", "source_path": "evidence/section_09_evidence.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-1532a63f8e4a" ], "section_title": "Computational Models of Addiction: Formalization, Validation, and Limits", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "43d33061a22aa4fed3f7dc71fabbfa48ab1d6f48", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAddiction" }, "generation_status": "complete", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d95cfb705572", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAddiction/blob/43d33061a22aa4fed3f7dc71fabbfa48ab1d6f48/evidence/section_09_evidence.json", "commit_sha": "43d33061a22aa4fed3f7dc71fabbfa48ab1d6f48", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewAddiction" }