{
"papers": [
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1523/ENEURO.0452-25.2026",
"value": "100-140",
"method": "spiking network model constrained by experimental data",
"metric": "ING gamma frequency range",
"n_analyzed": null,
"ci_or_error": null,
"text_access": "fulltext",
"n_definition": "network simulations",
"scope_region": "medial entorhinal cortex",
"study_system": "mouse mEC computational model",
"taxonomic_level": "PV fast-spiking interneurons",
"scope_population": "fast-spiking interneurons",
"value_source_sentence": "Simulations revealed that weak excitatory input to interneurons supports fast ING-dominated rhythms (∼100–140 Hz).",
"experimental_conditions": "weak excitatory input to interneurons"
},
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1523/ENEURO.0452-25.2026",
"value": "60-100",
"method": "spiking network model constrained by experimental data",
"metric": "PING gamma frequency range",
"n_analyzed": null,
"ci_or_error": null,
"text_access": "fulltext",
"n_definition": "network simulations",
"scope_region": "medial entorhinal cortex",
"study_system": "mouse mEC computational model",
"taxonomic_level": "PV fast-spiking interneurons and pyramidal cells",
"scope_population": "E-I network",
"value_source_sentence": "Simulations revealed that...strengthening excitatory drive induces a transition to slower PING-dominated oscillations (60–100 Hz).",
"experimental_conditions": "strengthened excitatory drive to interneurons"
},
{
"n": 3000,
"doi": "10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012259",
"value": "40",
"method": "morphology-constrained cortical network model",
"metric": "gamma frequency in E-I network",
"n_analyzed": null,
"ci_or_error": null,
"text_access": "fulltext",
"n_definition": "neurons in network model",
"scope_region": "motor cortex cross-sectional layer",
"study_system": "mouse motor cortex model (WT)",
"taxonomic_level": "PV fast-spiking and pyramidal neurons",
"scope_population": "pyramidal and fast-spiking interneurons",
"value_source_sentence": "Our findings reveal a dynamic interplay between pyramidal and fast-spiking interneurons leading to the emergence of gamma activity (∼40 Hz).",
"experimental_conditions": "wild-type morphological parameters"
},
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.3041-11.2011",
"value": "30-80",
"method": "biophysically detailed compartmental model with asynchronous GABA release",
"metric": "gamma oscillation frequency range",
"n_analyzed": null,
"ci_or_error": null,
"text_access": "abstract_only",
"n_definition": "cortical circuit model neurons",
"scope_region": "cortex (generic)",
"study_system": "biophysically detailed cortical circuit model",
"taxonomic_level": "PV fast-spiking interneurons",
"scope_population": "PV-pyramidal network",
"value_source_sentence": "Parvalbumin (PV)-expressing, fast-spiking interneurons interacting with pyramidal neurons generate cortical gamma oscillations (30–80 Hz) that synchronize cortical activity during cognitive processing.",
"experimental_conditions": "sensory stimulus-induced gamma"
}
],
"comparison_id": "gamma-frequency-across-models",
"comparison_name": "Gamma Oscillation Frequency Ranges Across Computational PV Models",
"comparison_type": "cross-study conflict",
"what_it_reveals": "Different computational models predict substantially different gamma frequency ranges depending on the balance of ING vs PING mechanisms, brain region, and model complexity. This highlights that 'gamma' is not a single phenomenon but spans a wide frequency range (30-140 Hz) with distinct mechanistic regimes.",
"homogeneity_check": {
"caveats": [
"Different brain regions: mEC, motor cortex, generic cortex",
"Different model complexity: from simplified spiking to biophysically detailed compartmental",
"ING vs PING vs combined mechanisms produce different frequency bands in the same model",
"3000-neuron model vs unspecified network sizes"
],
"n_definition_uniform": "false",
"scope_region_uniform": "false",
"taxonomic_level_uniform": "true",
"scope_population_uniform": "true"
},
"suggested_plot_type": "grouped bar"
}