Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
03d996ad1189Content snapshot
{ "kind": "infographic", "prompt": "The number of SST subtypes has grown dramatically from ~3 morphological types to >100 transcriptomic clusters over 20 years, but the practical taxonomy level may be ~10 supertypes. This comparison reveals how methodological advances and clustering resolution drive apparent diversity, not necessarily biological reality.", "provider": "other", "raw_fields": { "papers": [ { "doi": "10.1523/jneurosci.0661-06.2006", "value": "3", "method": "transgenic GFP lines + electrophysiology", "metric": "Number of SST subtypes identified", "cite_key": "Ma2006", "condition": "barrel cortex, 2006", "study_system": "mouse", "value_source_sentence": "By all criteria, there was nearly perfect segregation of X94 and X98 GFP+ neurons, whereas GIN GFP+ neurons exhibited intermediate properties." }, { "doi": "10.1038/nn.4216", "value": "~8 SST types within 23 GABAergic types", "method": "scRNA-seq (SMART-seq)", "metric": "Number of SST transcriptomic types", "cite_key": "Tasic2016", "condition": "visual cortex, 2016", "study_system": "mouse", "value_source_sentence": "We identify 49 transcriptomic cell types including 23 GABAergic, 19 glutamatergic and seven non-neuronal types." }, { "doi": "10.1038/s41586-018-0654-5", "value": "multiple SST types within 133 total types", "method": "scRNA-seq (SMART-seq v4)", "metric": "Number of SST transcriptomic types", "cite_key": "Tasic2018", "condition": "VISp + ALM, 2018", "study_system": "mouse", "value_source_sentence": "We define 133 transcriptomic cell types by deep, single-cell RNA sequencing." }, { "doi": "10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.057", "value": "13", "method": "Patch-seq (multimodal)", "metric": "Number of SST met-types", "cite_key": "Gouwens2020", "condition": "visual cortex, 2020", "study_system": "mouse", "value_source_sentence": "We identify 13 Sst met-types, which is substantially more than described in previous morphological and electrophysiological studies." }, { "doi": "10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.021", "value": "11 supertypes + Sst Chodl subclass", "method": "scRNA-seq (10x + SMART-seq)", "metric": "Number of SST supertypes", "cite_key": "Yao2021", "condition": "whole isocortex + HPF, 2021", "study_system": "mouse", "value_source_sentence": "The Sst and Pvalb subclasses are divided into 11 and 3 supertypes, respectively." }, { "doi": "10.3389/fncir.2024.1436915", "value": "~10 supertypes", "method": "review of transcriptomic studies", "metric": "Recommended practical SST subtype count", "cite_key": "Agmon2024", "condition": "neocortex, 2024", "study_system": "mouse", "value_source_sentence": "We suggest that for experimental analysis, the most useful taxonomic level is the subdivision of somatostatin interneurons into ten or so 'supertypes.'" } ], "comparison_id": "sst-subtype-count-across-studies", "comparison_name": "Number of SST Interneuron Subtypes Identified Across Major Taxonomy Studies", "comparison_type": "timeline", "what_it_reveals": "The number of SST subtypes has grown dramatically from ~3 morphological types to >100 transcriptomic clusters over 20 years, but the practical taxonomy level may be ~10 supertypes. This comparison reveals how methodological advances and clustering resolution drive apparent diversity, not necessarily biological reality.", "homogeneity_check": { "caveats": [ "Studies used different brain regions (barrel cortex vs visual cortex vs whole isocortex)", "Different methods (electrophysiology/morphology vs scRNA-seq vs multimodal Patch-seq) yield different type counts", "Clustering resolution dramatically affects the number of types identified", "Some studies count 'types' while others count 'supertypes' or 'met-types' which are different taxonomic levels" ], "comparable": false }, "suggested_plot_type": "grouped bar" }, "section_id": "section_02_evidence_package", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewSST/blob/89b7e9787cd90e942b0adb531d549af3ddad30f1/evidence/section_02_evidence_package.json", "target_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewsst-02", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewSST", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewsst-02", "source_path": "evidence/section_02_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-ed2a7f08ef35", "paper:paper-pm-33186530", "paper:paper-45d28ae23ca2", "paper:paper-pm-30382198", "paper:paper-5d546dd2545a", "paper:paper-4dfe44516146" ], "section_title": "Molecular Identity and Transcriptomic Taxonomy", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "89b7e9787cd90e942b0adb531d549af3ddad30f1", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewSST" }, "generation_status": "complete", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-8466d095488a", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewSST/blob/89b7e9787cd90e942b0adb531d549af3ddad30f1/evidence/section_02_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "89b7e9787cd90e942b0adb531d549af3ddad30f1", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewSST" }