Computational Models of Brain-Wide Neuromodulation
This section is represented as a source-backed SciDEX wiki artifact. The full source remains in the original computational-review repository.
Source: https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewNeuromodulation/blob/95db5c630fe54e183d9c452cf826ce502d4a872d/content/11_computational_models.md
Citation anchors captured: 146
Citation contexts
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference...
-
3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0 The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2 The recent extension to distributional reinforcement learning represents a significant theoretical advance. Rather than encoding a single scalar prediction error, different dopamine neurons may encode prediction errors relative to different quantiles of the value distribution, collectively representing the full distribution of expected outcomes 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4 noted that the seminal reward...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5 The recent extension to distributional reinforcement learning represents a significant theoretical advance. Rather than encoding a single scalar prediction error, different dopamine neurons may encode prediction errors relative to different quantiles of the value distribution, collectively representing the full distribution of expected outcomes 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7 noted that the seminal reward...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8 The recent extension to distributional reinforcement learning represents a significant theoretical advance. Rather than encoding a single scalar prediction error, different dopamine neurons may encode prediction errors relative to different quantiles of the value distribution, collectively representing the full distribution of expected outcomes 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9. 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0 noted that the seminal reward...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1 Critically, the RPE framework’s success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine’s computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2. 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3 evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4 Critically, the RPE framework’s success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine’s computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5. 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6 evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7 Critically, the RPE framework’s success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine’s computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8. 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9 evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0 Critically, the RPE framework’s success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine’s computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2 evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3 Critically, the RPE framework’s success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine’s computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5 evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6 Critically, the RPE framework’s success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine’s computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8 evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9 Critically, the RPE framework’s success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine’s computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0. 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1 evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...
-
3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2 Three-factor learning rules — in which Hebbian co-activation is gated by a dopaminergic eligibility trace — represent the primary mechanism by which RPE signals are thought to drive synaptic plasticity 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3. 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4 presented a computational model in which acetylcholine, released by striatal cholinergic interneurons, acts as a channel-specific gating signal that restricts...
-
3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5 Three-factor learning rules — in which Hebbian co-activation is gated by a dopaminergic eligibility trace — represent the primary mechanism by which RPE signals are thought to drive synaptic plasticity 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6. 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7 presented a computational model in which acetylcholine, released by striatal cholinergic interneurons, acts as a channel-specific gating signal that restricts...
-
3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8 Three-factor learning rules — in which Hebbian co-activation is gated by a dopaminergic eligibility trace — represent the primary mechanism by which RPE signals are thought to drive synaptic plasticity 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0 presented a computational model in which acetylcholine, released by striatal cholinergic interneurons, acts as a channel-specific gating signal that restricts...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1 Three-factor learning rules — in which Hebbian co-activation is gated by a dopaminergic eligibility trace — represent the primary mechanism by which RPE signals are thought to drive synaptic plasticity 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3 presented a computational model in which acetylcholine, released by striatal cholinergic interneurons, acts as a channel-specific gating signal that restricts...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4 Beyond the RPE framework’s core predictions, computational models have been applied to increasingly complex decision-making scenarios that test the framework’s generality. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5 showed that decision making occurs in dynamic contexts in which individual and reward attributes change, requiring models that go beyond static RPE signals to capture the temporal evolution of value estimates. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6 analyzed t...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7 Beyond the RPE framework’s core predictions, computational models have been applied to increasingly complex decision-making scenarios that test the framework’s generality. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8 showed that decision making occurs in dynamic contexts in which individual and reward attributes change, requiring models that go beyond static RPE signals to capture the temporal evolution of value estimates. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9 analyzed t...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0 Beyond the RPE framework’s core predictions, computational models have been applied to increasingly complex decision-making scenarios that test the framework’s generality. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1 showed that decision making occurs in dynamic contexts in which individual and reward attributes change, requiring models that go beyond static RPE signals to capture the temporal evolution of value estimates. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2 analyzed t...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3 Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4 found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5 demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6 Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7 found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8 demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9 Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0 found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1 demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2 Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3 found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4 demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5 Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6 found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7 demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8 Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9 found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0 demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1 Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2 found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3 demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4 An influential normative framework assigns specific computational roles to acetylcholine and norepinephrine within Bayesian inference: acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty (the known unreliability of the current environment), while norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty (the detection that the environment has fundamentally changed) 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5. This framework is mathema...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6 An influential normative framework assigns specific computational roles to acetylcholine and norepinephrine within Bayesian inference: acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty (the known unreliability of the current environment), while norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty (the detection that the environment has fundamentally changed) 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7. This framework is mathema...
-
2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8 An influential normative framework assigns specific computational roles to acetylcholine and norepinephrine within Bayesian inference: acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty (the known unreliability of the current environment), while norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty (the detection that the environment has fundamentally changed) 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9. This framework is mathema...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference0 An influential normative framework assigns specific computational roles to acetylcholine and norepinephrine within Bayesian inference: acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty (the known unreliability of the current environment), while norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty (the detection that the environment has fundamentally changed) 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference1. This framework is mathema...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference2 An influential normative framework assigns specific computational roles to acetylcholine and norepinephrine within Bayesian inference: acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty (the known unreliability of the current environment), while norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty (the detection that the environment has fundamentally changed) 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference3. This framework is mathema...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference4 Recent work has begun to address this gap from the norepinephrine side. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference5 provided quantitative evidence that frontal norepinephrine acts as a threat prediction error signal, fitting cue-evoked NE to a Rescorla-Wagner model with adjusted R² = 0.6869 for acquisition and adjusted R² = 0.6911 for extinction trials. Critically, NE poorly predicted behavioral freezing (adjusted R² = 0.0124), suggesting that NE e...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference6 Recent work has begun to address this gap from the norepinephrine side. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference7 provided quantitative evidence that frontal norepinephrine acts as a threat prediction error signal, fitting cue-evoked NE to a Rescorla-Wagner model with adjusted R² = 0.6869 for acquisition and adjusted R² = 0.6911 for extinction trials. Critically, NE poorly predicted behavioral freezing (adjusted R² = 0.0124), suggesting that NE e...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference8 Recent work has begun to address this gap from the norepinephrine side. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference9 provided quantitative evidence that frontal norepinephrine acts as a threat prediction error signal, fitting cue-evoked NE to a Rescorla-Wagner model with adjusted R² = 0.6869 for acquisition and adjusted R² = 0.6911 for extinction trials. Critically, NE poorly predicted behavioral freezing (adjusted R² = 0.0124), suggesting that NE e...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference00 Pharmacological studies in humans have provided additional evidence consistent with, but not uniquely predicted by, the Bayesian uncertainty framework. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference01 used a double-blind, counterbalanced design with healthy adults to examine how pharmacological manipulation affects EEG signatures of prediction error processing, finding modulator-specific effects on neural responses to expectation violation. [Meijer2026...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference02 Pharmacological studies in humans have provided additional evidence consistent with, but not uniquely predicted by, the Bayesian uncertainty framework. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference03 used a double-blind, counterbalanced design with healthy adults to examine how pharmacological manipulation affects EEG signatures of prediction error processing, finding modulator-specific effects on neural responses to expectation violation. [Meijer2026...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference04 Pharmacological studies in humans have provided additional evidence consistent with, but not uniquely predicted by, the Bayesian uncertainty framework. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference05 used a double-blind, counterbalanced design with healthy adults to examine how pharmacological manipulation affects EEG signatures of prediction error processing, finding modulator-specific effects on neural responses to expectation violation. [Meijer2026...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference06 The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference07. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference08 described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference09 The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference10. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference11 described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference12 The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference13. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference14 described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference15 The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference16. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference17 described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference18 The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference19. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference20 described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference21 The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference22. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference23 described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference24 The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference25. 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference26 described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference27 Multiple competing frameworks assign computational roles to norepinephrine: adaptive gain theory positions NE as optimizing the explore-exploit trade-off via gain modulation; the Bayesian uncertainty account treats NE as signaling unexpected uncertainty; and arousal optimization models describe NE as setting global arousal state along a Yerkes-Dodson curve 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference28. These framework...
-
1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference29 Multiple competing frameworks assign computational roles to norepinephrine: adaptive gain theory positions NE as optimizing the explore-exploit trade-off via gain modulation; the Bayesian uncertainty account treats NE as signaling unexpected uncertainty; and arousal optimization models describe NE as setting global arousal state along a Yerkes-Dodson curve 1CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 2CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference, 3CitationThe TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...content/11_computational_models.md:line 7Open reference30. These framework...
-
... 96 additional anchors in refs_json
References
- [Mah2024] “The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...”
- [Qu2025] “The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...”
- [Batten2024] “The TD learning framework for dopamine remains the most quantitatively validated computational account of any neuromodulatory system. The core hypothesis — that phasic dopamine neuron firing encodes a reward prediction error (RPE) signal used to update value estimates — has accumulated converging evidence from electrophysiology, voltammetry, and computational modeling over three decades [Mah2024, Qu2025, Batten2024]...”
- [Dabas2025] “The recent extension to distributional reinforcement learning represents a significant theoretical advance. Rather than encoding a single scalar prediction error, different dopamine neurons may encode prediction errors relative to different quantiles of the value distribution, collectively representing the full distribution of expected outcomes [Dabas2025, Mahajan2025b]. [Mahajan2025b] noted that the seminal reward...”
- [Mahajan2025b] “The recent extension to distributional reinforcement learning represents a significant theoretical advance. Rather than encoding a single scalar prediction error, different dopamine neurons may encode prediction errors relative to different quantiles of the value distribution, collectively representing the full distribution of expected outcomes [Dabas2025, Mahajan2025b]. [Mahajan2025b] noted that the seminal reward...”
- [Mahajan2025a] “Critically, the RPE framework's success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine's computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached [Mahajan2025a, Udden2010]. [Udden2010] evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...”
- [Udden2010] “Critically, the RPE framework's success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine's computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached [Mahajan2025a, Udden2010]. [Udden2010] evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...”
- [Peters2021] “Critically, the RPE framework's success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine's computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached [Mahajan2025a, Udden2010]. [Udden2010] evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...”
- [Courtiol2021] “Critically, the RPE framework's success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine's computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached [Mahajan2025a, Udden2010]. [Udden2010] evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...”
- [Akhmirov2024] “Critically, the RPE framework's success has shaped research allocation in ways that constrain the broader field. Dopamine's computational role has been modeled with a precision that other modulators have not approached [Mahajan2025a, Udden2010]. [Udden2010] evaluated findings in the context of relevant computational models related to dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, and noradrenalin, highlighting the asymmetric d...”
- [GonzalezRedondo2025] “Three-factor learning rules — in which Hebbian co-activation is gated by a dopaminergic eligibility trace — represent the primary mechanism by which RPE signals are thought to drive synaptic plasticity [GonzalezRedondo2025, Chalmers2024]. [GonzalezRedondo2025] presented a computational model in which acetylcholine, released by striatal cholinergic interneurons, acts as a channel-specific gating signal that restricts...”
- [Chalmers2024] “Three-factor learning rules — in which Hebbian co-activation is gated by a dopaminergic eligibility trace — represent the primary mechanism by which RPE signals are thought to drive synaptic plasticity [GonzalezRedondo2025, Chalmers2024]. [GonzalezRedondo2025] presented a computational model in which acetylcholine, released by striatal cholinergic interneurons, acts as a channel-specific gating signal that restricts...”
- [Lile2026] “Beyond the RPE framework's core predictions, computational models have been applied to increasingly complex decision-making scenarios that test the framework's generality. [Lile2026] showed that decision making occurs in dynamic contexts in which individual and reward attributes change, requiring models that go beyond static RPE signals to capture the temporal evolution of value estimates. [DiasMaile2025] analyzed t...”
- [DiasMaile2025] “Beyond the RPE framework's core predictions, computational models have been applied to increasingly complex decision-making scenarios that test the framework's generality. [Lile2026] showed that decision making occurs in dynamic contexts in which individual and reward attributes change, requiring models that go beyond static RPE signals to capture the temporal evolution of value estimates. [DiasMaile2025] analyzed t...”
- [Benrimoh2025] “Beyond the RPE framework's core predictions, computational models have been applied to increasingly complex decision-making scenarios that test the framework's generality. [Lile2026] showed that decision making occurs in dynamic contexts in which individual and reward attributes change, requiring models that go beyond static RPE signals to capture the temporal evolution of value estimates. [DiasMaile2025] analyzed t...”
- [Blain2020] “Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. [Batten2024] found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. [Blain2020] demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...”
- [Batten2025] “Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. [Batten2024] found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. [Blain2020] demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...”
- [Raduner2026] “Trial-by-trial dopamine signals track not only reward prediction errors but also social and non-reward variables, complicating the pure RPE account. [Batten2024] found that regardless of social context, relative changes in dopamine tracked trial-by-trial changes in reward expectations. [Blain2020] demonstrated that momentary happiness is associated with reward prediction error signals, extending the RPE framework be...”
- [Kurtenbach2024] “An influential normative framework assigns specific computational roles to acetylcholine and norepinephrine within Bayesian inference: acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty (the known unreliability of the current environment), while norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty (the detection that the environment has fundamentally changed) [Kurtenbach2024, Howlett2025, OCallaghan2025]. This framework is mathema...”
- [Howlett2025] “An influential normative framework assigns specific computational roles to acetylcholine and norepinephrine within Bayesian inference: acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty (the known unreliability of the current environment), while norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty (the detection that the environment has fundamentally changed) [Kurtenbach2024, Howlett2025, OCallaghan2025]. This framework is mathema...”
- [OCallaghan2025] “An influential normative framework assigns specific computational roles to acetylcholine and norepinephrine within Bayesian inference: acetylcholine signals expected uncertainty (the known unreliability of the current environment), while norepinephrine signals unexpected uncertainty (the detection that the environment has fundamentally changed) [Kurtenbach2024, Howlett2025, OCallaghan2025]. This framework is mathema...”
- [Basu2024] “Recent work has begun to address this gap from the norepinephrine side. [Basu2024] provided quantitative evidence that frontal norepinephrine acts as a threat prediction error signal, fitting cue-evoked NE to a Rescorla-Wagner model with adjusted R² = 0.6869 for acquisition and adjusted R² = 0.6911 for extinction trials. Critically, NE poorly predicted behavioral freezing (adjusted R² = 0.0124), suggesting that NE e...”
- [Pandian2025] “Recent work has begun to address this gap from the norepinephrine side. [Basu2024] provided quantitative evidence that frontal norepinephrine acts as a threat prediction error signal, fitting cue-evoked NE to a Rescorla-Wagner model with adjusted R² = 0.6869 for acquisition and adjusted R² = 0.6911 for extinction trials. Critically, NE poorly predicted behavioral freezing (adjusted R² = 0.0124), suggesting that NE e...”
- [Zhou2026a] “Pharmacological studies in humans have provided additional evidence consistent with, but not uniquely predicted by, the Bayesian uncertainty framework. [Zhou2026a] used a double-blind, counterbalanced design with healthy adults to examine how pharmacological manipulation affects EEG signatures of prediction error processing, finding modulator-specific effects on neural responses to expectation violation. [Meijer2026...”
- [Meijer2026] “Pharmacological studies in humans have provided additional evidence consistent with, but not uniquely predicted by, the Bayesian uncertainty framework. [Zhou2026a] used a double-blind, counterbalanced design with healthy adults to examine how pharmacological manipulation affects EEG signatures of prediction error processing, finding modulator-specific effects on neural responses to expectation violation. [Meijer2026...”
- [Feng2024b] “Pharmacological studies in humans have provided additional evidence consistent with, but not uniquely predicted by, the Bayesian uncertainty framework. [Zhou2026a] used a double-blind, counterbalanced design with healthy adults to examine how pharmacological manipulation affects EEG signatures of prediction error processing, finding modulator-specific effects on neural responses to expectation violation. [Meijer2026...”
- [Limanowski2024] “The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy [Limanowski2024, Krupnik2025, Taghva2026, Usler2025]. [Limanowski2024] described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...”
- [Krupnik2025] “The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy [Limanowski2024, Krupnik2025, Taghva2026, Usler2025]. [Limanowski2024] described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...”
- [Taghva2026] “The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy [Limanowski2024, Krupnik2025, Taghva2026, Usler2025]. [Limanowski2024] described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...”
- [Usler2025] “The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy [Limanowski2024, Krupnik2025, Taghva2026, Usler2025]. [Limanowski2024] described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...”
- [Alotaibi2026] “The active inference and predictive processing frameworks offer an alternative formalization in which neuromodulators regulate the precision (inverse variance) of predictions and prediction errors at different levels of the cortical hierarchy [Limanowski2024, Krupnik2025, Taghva2026, Usler2025]. [Limanowski2024] described how active inference frames Bayes-optimal behaviour as motivated by minimisation of variational...”
- [Beerendonk2025] “Multiple competing frameworks assign computational roles to norepinephrine: adaptive gain theory positions NE as optimizing the explore-exploit trade-off via gain modulation; the Bayesian uncertainty account treats NE as signaling unexpected uncertainty; and arousal optimization models describe NE as setting global arousal state along a Yerkes-Dodson curve [Beerendonk2025, Goodridge2025, Nassar2024]. These framework...”
- [Goodridge2025] “Multiple competing frameworks assign computational roles to norepinephrine: adaptive gain theory positions NE as optimizing the explore-exploit trade-off via gain modulation; the Bayesian uncertainty account treats NE as signaling unexpected uncertainty; and arousal optimization models describe NE as setting global arousal state along a Yerkes-Dodson curve [Beerendonk2025, Goodridge2025, Nassar2024]. These framework...”
- [Nassar2024] “Multiple competing frameworks assign computational roles to norepinephrine: adaptive gain theory positions NE as optimizing the explore-exploit trade-off via gain modulation; the Bayesian uncertainty account treats NE as signaling unexpected uncertainty; and arousal optimization models describe NE as setting global arousal state along a Yerkes-Dodson curve [Beerendonk2025, Goodridge2025, Nassar2024]. These framework...”
Sister wikis (recently updated · no domain on this page)
- Agent Recipe: AI-for-Biology Closed-Loop with Reviewer Handoffs and Eval Contracts
- Agent Recipe: AI-for-Biology Closed-Loop with Reviewer Handoffs and Eval Contracts
- test
- JGBO-I27: Top 10 GBO Questions for Prioritization
- JGBO-I27: Top 10 GBO Questions for Prioritization
- Design Brief: Beta-test Evaluation Protocol for SciDEX v2 Design Trajectories
- Andy — Showcase Findings (auto-curated)
- Kris — Showcase Findings (auto-curated)
Recent activity here
No recent events touching this page.