Computational Models of Loop Function
This section is represented as a source-backed SciDEX wiki artifact. The full source remains in the original computational-review repository.
Source: https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/content/sec_13_computational_models.md
Citation anchors captured: 190
Citation contexts
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, and recent spik...
-
2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, and recent spik...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, and recent spik...
-
4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1, and recent spik...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4, and recent spik...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7, and recent spik...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0, and recent spik...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3, and recent spik...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6, and recent spik...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9, and recent spik...
-
2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2, and recent spik...
-
2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5, and recent spik...
-
2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8, and recent spik...
-
2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1, and recent spik...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4, and recent spik...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7, and recent spik...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8 The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0, and recent spik...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1 together with subtyp...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4 together with subtyp...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7 together with subtyp...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6 together with subtyp...
-
3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 3CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 5CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9 together with subtyp...
-
4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference0 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference1. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference2 together with subtyp...
-
4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference3 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference4. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference5 together with subtyp...
-
4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference6 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference7. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference8 together with subtyp...
-
4CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference9 Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference00. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference01 together with subtyp...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference02 The Frank D1/D2 framework yields a sharp pharmacological prediction: Parkinson’s patients withdrawn from levodopa should learn preferentially from negative outcomes, and treated patients from positive outcomes — a “carrot/stick” dissociation that 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference03 originally reported and that has been replicated as a behavioural signature of dual-pathway gating 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference04. **Conflict 1 — generality of th...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference05 The Frank D1/D2 framework yields a sharp pharmacological prediction: Parkinson’s patients withdrawn from levodopa should learn preferentially from negative outcomes, and treated patients from positive outcomes — a “carrot/stick” dissociation that 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference06 originally reported and that has been replicated as a behavioural signature of dual-pathway gating 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference07. **Conflict 1 — generality of th...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference08 The Frank D1/D2 framework yields a sharp pharmacological prediction: Parkinson’s patients withdrawn from levodopa should learn preferentially from negative outcomes, and treated patients from positive outcomes — a “carrot/stick” dissociation that 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference09 originally reported and that has been replicated as a behavioural signature of dual-pathway gating 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference10. **Conflict 1 — generality of th...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference11 The Frank D1/D2 framework yields a sharp pharmacological prediction: Parkinson’s patients withdrawn from levodopa should learn preferentially from negative outcomes, and treated patients from positive outcomes — a “carrot/stick” dissociation that 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference12 originally reported and that has been replicated as a behavioural signature of dual-pathway gating 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference13. **Conflict 1 — generality of th...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference14 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference15. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference16 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference17 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference18. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference19 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference20 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference21. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference22 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference23 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference24. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference25 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference26 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference27. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference28 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference29 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference30. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference31 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference32 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference33. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference34 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference35 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference36. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference37 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference38 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference39. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference40 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference41 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference42. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference43 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference44 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference45. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference46 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference47 The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference48. 1CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference, 2CitationThe earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...content/sec_13_computational_models.md:line 8Open reference49 showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...
-
... 140 additional anchors in refs_json
References
- [MINK1996] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Parent1995a] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Humphries2012] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Berthet2012] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Berthet2016] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Mandali2015] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Bahuguna2015] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Tomkins2014] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Frank2005] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Frank2004] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Frank2011] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Surmeier2007] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Shen2008] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Lindahl2016] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Ortone2023] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Khamassi2012] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Morita2014] “The earliest formal proposal cast the basal ganglia as a focused-selection mechanism: tonic GPi/SNr inhibition is locally relieved by phasic striatal input while a parallel STN-mediated surround tightens inhibition over competitors [MINK1996, Parent1995a]. The Gurney–Prescott–Redgrave family of models formalised this as competitive selection between channels [Humphries2012, Berthet2012, Berthet2016], and recent spik...”
- [Pedersen2016] “Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions [Frank2005, MINK1996, Bahuguna2015, Berthet2012, Berthet2016, Mandali2015, Lindahl2016]. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations [Frank2004, Pedersen2016, Wagenmakers2017, Swart2017] together with subtyp...”
- [Wagenmakers2017] “Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions [Frank2005, MINK1996, Bahuguna2015, Berthet2012, Berthet2016, Mandali2015, Lindahl2016]. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations [Frank2004, Pedersen2016, Wagenmakers2017, Swart2017] together with subtyp...”
- [Swart2017] “Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions [Frank2005, MINK1996, Bahuguna2015, Berthet2012, Berthet2016, Mandali2015, Lindahl2016]. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations [Frank2004, Pedersen2016, Wagenmakers2017, Swart2017] together with subtyp...”
- [VanNuland2020] “Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions [Frank2005, MINK1996, Bahuguna2015, Berthet2012, Berthet2016, Mandali2015, Lindahl2016]. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations [Frank2004, Pedersen2016, Wagenmakers2017, Swart2017] together with subtyp...”
- [Lindi2023] “Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions [Frank2005, MINK1996, Bahuguna2015, Berthet2012, Berthet2016, Mandali2015, Lindahl2016]. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations [Frank2004, Pedersen2016, Wagenmakers2017, Swart2017] together with subtyp...”
- [Klein2022] “Direct/Go versus indirect/NoGo dichotomy: model predictions and empirical validations across optogenetic, calcium-imaging, and human PET datasets, grouped by evidence level. (A) Computational model predictions [Frank2005, MINK1996, Bahuguna2015, Berthet2012, Berthet2016, Mandali2015, Lindahl2016]. (B) Behavioural / pharmacological validations [Frank2004, Pedersen2016, Wagenmakers2017, Swart2017] together with subtyp...”
- [Mehrotra2023] “The Frank D1/D2 framework yields a sharp pharmacological prediction: Parkinson's patients withdrawn from levodopa should learn preferentially from negative outcomes, and treated patients from positive outcomes — a "carrot/stick" dissociation that [Frank2004] originally reported and that has been replicated as a behavioural signature of dual-pathway gating [Pedersen2016, Mehrotra2023]. **Conflict 1 — generality of th...”
- [Schultz1993] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Schultz1997] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Schultz1998] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Schultz2000] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Bayer2005] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Matsumoto2009] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Suri2001] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Niv2006] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [ODoherty2003] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [McClure2004] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Seymour2004] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
- [Chakroun2020] “The TD-RPE account of dopamine — that midbrain dopamine neurons encode the difference between received and predicted reward, and that their projections to ventral striatum (VS) update cached values — is one of the most replicated claims in systems neuroscience [Schultz1993, Schultz1997, Schultz1998, Schultz2000, Bayer2005, Matsumoto2009]. [Suri2001] showed that the same TD signal also reproduces tonic anticipatory r...”
Sister wikis (recently updated · no domain on this page)
- Agent Recipe: AI-for-Biology Closed-Loop with Reviewer Handoffs and Eval Contracts
- Agent Recipe: AI-for-Biology Closed-Loop with Reviewer Handoffs and Eval Contracts
- test
- JGBO-I27: Top 10 GBO Questions for Prioritization
- JGBO-I27: Top 10 GBO Questions for Prioritization
- Design Brief: Beta-test Evaluation Protocol for SciDEX v2 Design Trajectories
- Andy — Showcase Findings (auto-curated)
- Kris — Showcase Findings (auto-curated)
Recent activity here
No recent events touching this page.