Overview
Microglia activation represents the innate immune response of the brain, playing a dual role in neurodegeneration—protective clearance of pathogens and debris versus chronic neuroinflammation that drives disease progression1Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease (2015)Open reference. These resident macrophages constitute 10-15% of brain cells and are critical in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), and other neurodegenerative disorders2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference.
Microglia are unique immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS) that originate from embryonic yolk sac progenitors and self-renew locally throughout life3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference. Unlike peripheral macrophages, microglia maintain their population through self-proliferation rather than continuous recruitment from bone marrow-derived monocytes4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference. This self-renewal capacity is mediated by the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) signaling pathway, which has become a therapeutic target for modulating microglial abundance in disease states5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference.
The concept of microglial polarization has evolved significantly over the past decade. Initially described as a binary M1/M2 classification, current understanding recognizes microglia exist on a spectrum of activation states influenced by the local microenvironment6Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)Open reference. This spectrum includes surveillant (homeostatic), disease-associated microglia (DAM), and various intermediate phenotypes that can transition between states depending on pathological cues7TREM2-Deficient Microglia (2017)Open reference.
Microglia Development and Ontogeny
Embryonic Origin
Microglia arise from primitive macrophages in the embryonic yolk sac during early development (embryonic day 7-8 in mice)8Microglia derive from yolk sac (1999)Open reference. This distinct ontogeny explains their unique transcriptional signature compared to peripheral myeloid cells9Microglia development (2013)Open reference. The transcription factor PU.1 (encoded by SPI1) is essential for microglial development, and conditional knockout results in complete absence of microglia in the adult brain10PU.1 is essential for microglia (2012)Open reference.
Key developmental transcription factors include:
-
PU.1: Master regulator of myeloid cell fate
-
IRF8: Controls microglial identity and gene expression
-
CSF1R: Receptor for CSF1 and IL-34, required for survival and proliferation
-
CX3CR1: Fractalkine receptor defining the microglial lineage
The embryonic origin of microglia was definitively established through fate-mapping studies using the Cx3cr1^CreER^ system, which demonstrated that adult microglia derive exclusively from yolk sac progenitors that colonize the brain rudiment before the onset of definitive hematopoiesis2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference0.
Adult Maintenance
In the healthy adult brain, microglia maintain homeostasis through continuous surveillance of their territory2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference1. Each microglia extends highly motile processes that scan the surrounding parenchyma every few hours, enabling rapid detection of pathological changes2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference2. This surveillance function is energy-intensive and requires intact mitochondrial metabolism2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference3.
The adult microglial population turns over slowly, with an estimated half-life of several years in humans2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference4. However, this turnover can be dramatically accelerated in disease states, where microglial proliferation becomes a major source of new microglia at lesion sites2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference5.
Regional Heterogeneity
Microglia exhibit remarkable heterogeneity across different brain regions. Transcriptomic studies have identified region-specific microglial signatures, with the hippocampus and substantia nigra showing distinct gene expression patterns2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference6. This heterogeneity likely reflects adaptations to local neuronal populations, synaptic activity, and microenvironmental cues.
| Brain Region | Key Features | Density (cells/mm³) |
|---|---|---|
| Cortex | Surveillance-dominant | 5,000-10,000 |
| Hippocampus | High plasticity markers | 8,000-12,000 |
| Substantia nigra | High activation markers | 10,000-15,000 |
| Cerebellum | Unique transcriptional profile | 3,000-6,000 |
| White matter | Lower density | 2,000-5,000 |
Microglia States
Surveillance State (Homeostatic)
Resting microglia in the healthy brain maintain a characteristic phenotype:
-
Morphology: Highly ramified with small cell body and long, thin processes
-
Process motility: Continuous extension and retraction (2-3 μm/minute)
-
TREM2/DAP12 signaling: Maintains quiescence through inhibitory signaling
-
Surface markers: CX3CR1^high^, P2RY12^high^, TMEM119^high^, PU.1^positive^
-
Gene expression: Low levels of immune activation genes, high levels of homeostatic genes
The homeostatic microglial transcriptome is defined by a set of “microglial signature genes” including CX3CR1, P2RY12, P2RY13, TMEM119, HEXB, and CSF1R2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference7. These genes are downregulated upon activation and serve as markers of the surveillant state.
Key homeostatic functions include:
-
Synaptic surveillance: Microglial processes transiently contact synapses, particularly during development and in response to activity changes2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference8
-
Cell death surveillance: Detection and clearance of apoptotic cells through phosphatidylserine recognition2Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)Open reference9
-
Metabolic support: Provision of lactate and other metabolites to neurons3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference0
The transition from surveillance to activated states is tightly regulated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that detect damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs)3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference1.
Activated States
M1-like (Pro-inflammatory)
Classical activation driven by:
-
TLR4 recognition of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs)
-
IFN-γ priming from adaptive immunity
-
NLRP3 inflammasome assembly
-
CD40/CD40L interaction with T cells
-
IFN-β autocrine signaling
Key markers: CD16, CD32, CD86, iNOS, MHC-II, CCR7, FCGR1A
Secreted factors:
-
Pro-inflammatory cytokines: TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, IL-18, IL-23
-
Chemoattractants: CCL2, CCL5, CXCL1, CXCL10, CXCL12
-
Nitric oxide (NO) via iNOS
-
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) via NADPH oxidase (NOX2)
-
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-9, MMP-12)
The classical activation cascade involves recognition of ligands by TLR4, recruitment of adaptor proteins MyD88 and TRIF, activation of NF-κB and IRF3 transcription factors, and subsequent transcription of inflammatory genes3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference2. IFN-γ synergizes with TLR signaling through STAT1 activation, amplifying the inflammatory response.
M2-like (Neuroprotective)
Alternative activation driven by:
-
IL-4, IL-13, IL-10 signaling
-
TGF-β production
-
TREM2 activation (in AD)
-
Glucocorticoid signaling
-
IL-33 release from astrocytes
Key markers: CD206 (mannose receptor), Arg1, YM1, Fizz1, IL-10, TGF-β, CCL17, CCL22
Secreted factors:
-
Neurotrophic factors: BDNF, NGF, GDNF, CNTF
-
Anti-inflammatory cytokines: IL-10, TGF-β, IL-1RA
-
Growth factors: VEGF, IGF-1
-
Extracellular matrix proteins
IL-4 signaling activates STAT6, which drives expression of arginase-1 (Arg1), YM1, and Fizz13Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference3. These genes encode proteins involved in tissue repair and anti-inflammatory functions. The Arg1 enzyme competes with iNOS for L-arginine substrate, thereby reducing NO production and promoting polyamine synthesis for cell proliferation and tissue remodeling.
Disease-Associated Microglia (DAM)
A specialized microglial phenotype identified in Alzheimer’s disease represents a distinct activation state3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference4:
-
Stage 1 (TREM2-independent): Downregulation of homeostatic genes (P2RY12, TMEM119), upregulation of Type II interferon genes
-
Stage 2 (TREM2-dependent): Upregulation of lipid metabolism genes, phagocytic genes, and disease-associated genes
Key genes upregulated in DAM: APOE, TREM2, CTSD (cathepsin D), LPL (lipoprotein lipase), ITGAX (CD11C), CLEC7A3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference5
The transition from homeostatic microglia to DAM requires functional TREM2, and loss-of-function TREM2 variants block the DAM response, leading to reduced amyloid plaque compaction and altered plaque morphology3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference6.
Additional Microglial Phenotypes
Recent single-cell studies have revealed additional microglial states:
-
Aging-associated microglia (AAM): Upregulation of aging-related genes including Cst3, Ctsb, Ctsd3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference7
-
Injury-responsive microglia (IRM): Distinct transcriptional response to acute CNS injury3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference8
-
Lipid-loaded microglia: Foam cell-like phenotype in demyelinating diseases3Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)Open reference9
-
Proliferative response microglia (PRM): Highly proliferative cells in demyelinating lesions4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference0
TREM2 Variants and Risk
TREM2 variants significantly alter microglial function and modify Alzheimer’s disease risk4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference1:
| Variant | Effect on Function | Disease Association | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| R47H | Loss of lipid binding, reduced phagocytosis | ~3x AD risk | 0.3-0.5% |
| R62H | Reduced ligand recognition | ~2x AD risk | 0.5-0.7% |
| R33X | Truncated protein, no signaling | Nasu-Hakola disease | Rare |
| D87N | Impaired signaling | AD risk variant | 0.1% |
| T96K | Reduced function | AD risk variant | Rare |
These loss-of-function variants demonstrate that reduced microglial phagocytic capacity increases AD risk, highlighting the protective role of microglia in clearing amyloid deposits4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference2.
Neurodegenerative Disease Context
Alzheimer’s Disease
Microglia in AD exhibit both protective and pathogenic roles depending on disease stage4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference3:
| Phase | TREM2 Status | Microglial Function | Therapeutic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-clinical | Normal | Surveillance, Aβ clearance | Support TREM2 function |
| Early | Risk variant (R47H) | Reduced amyloid clearance | TREM2 agonists |
| Mid | TREM2 upregulation | Plaque-associated clustering | May be protective |
| Late | TREM2 dysfunction | Chronic inflammation | Anti-inflammatory |
Key interactions:
-
Amyloid-beta recognition via TLR4, CD14, CD36, RAGE
-
Tau propagation via exosomes
-
Complement-mediated synapse elimination (C1q, C3)
-
APOE4-mediated inflammatory responses
-
Neuronal loss triggers DAMP release
The microglial landscape in AD has been extensively characterized through single-cell RNA sequencing, revealing disease-specific transcriptional programs that differ from aging microglia4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference4. Apoe-expressing microglia cluster near amyloid plaques and display enhanced antigen presentation and inflammatory gene expression4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference5.
Amyloid clearance mechanisms:
-
Receptor-mediated phagocytosis: TREM2, CD36, TLRs
-
Macroautophagy: Internalization and lysosomal degradation
-
Proteolytic degradation: Neprilysin, IDE
-
Perivascular drainage: Clearance along basement membranes
Tau pathology propagation:
-
Microglia phagocytose tau-containing neurons
-
Tau is packaged into exosomes
-
Exosomal tau is released and taken up by neighboring neurons
-
This spreads tau pathology throughout connected brain regions
Complement-mediated synapse loss:
-
C1q localizes to synapses in early AD
-
Microglia recognize C1q-tagged synapses via CR3
-
Synaptic phagocytosis contributes to cognitive decline4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference6
Parkinson’s Disease
Microglial activation in PD is among the earliest pathological changes4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference7:
-
Substantia nigra pars compacta shows highest density of activated microglia
-
Chronic activation precedes motor symptoms by years
-
Postmortem studies show MHC-II positive microglia in >90% of PD cases
-
Activation correlates with dopaminergic neuron loss
Triggers:
-
α-Synuclein aggregates (via TLR2, TLR4, CD36)
-
Mitochondrial DAMPs from dying dopaminergic neurons
-
Environmental toxins (MPTP, rotenone, paraquat)
-
Gut-derived microbial molecules (via vagus nerve)
-
Neuromelanin release from dying neurons
Neuroinflammatory cascade:
-
α-Synuclein oligomers activate TLR2/4 on microglia
-
MyD88-dependent signaling activates NF-κB
-
Pro-inflammatory cytokine release (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6)
-
NADPH oxidase generates ROS
-
Cytokines cause dopaminergic neuron toxicity
-
Dying neurons release more DAMPs, creating feedback loop
Genetic risk factors:
-
LRRK2 G2019S increases microglial inflammation4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference8
-
Parkin and PINK1 mutations affect mitophagy and DAMP release
-
GBA variants enhance microglial activation4Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)Open reference9
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Microglia in ALS demonstrate rapid activation concurrent with motor neuron loss5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference0:
-
Mutant SOD1 triggers non-cell-autonomous toxicity
-
P2X7 receptor mediates inflammatory cascade
-
Proliferating microglia surround motor neurons
-
MCP-1 (CCL2) drives monocyte recruitment
Microglial phenotypes in ALS:
-
M1-like markers: iNOS, NOX2, IL-1β (disease progression)
-
M2-like markers: YM1, CD206 (early disease)
-
Transition from neuroprotective to neurotoxic with disease progression
SOD1 models:
-
Mutant SOD1G93A mice show microglial activation at disease onset
-
Selective removal of mutant SOD1 from microglia delays disease
-
NF-κB activation in microglia drives progression5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference1
Multiple Sclerosis
Microglia play complex roles in demyelination and remyelination5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference2:
-
Actively phagocytose myelin debris (beneficial for remyelination)
-
Present antigens to T cells (pathogenic)
-
Secrete inflammatory cytokines that damage oligodendrocytes
-
Support remyelination through growth factor secretion
-
Form lesions with distinct microglial subpopulations
Lesion stages:
-
Pre-active lesions: Microglial activation without demyelination
-
Active lesions: Inflammatory demyelination with macrophage infiltration
-
Shadow lesions: Remyelination with reduced microglia
-
Chronic lesions: Inactive microglia, persistent demyelination
Signaling Pathways
NF-κB Pathway
The primary driver of pro-inflammatory gene expression:
TLR4 activation → MyD88 → IRAK4/1 → TRAF6 → IKK → IκB degradation
↓
NF-κB translocation
↓
Pro-inflammatory gene transcription
Key targets:
-
Cytokines: TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12
-
Chemokines: CCL2, CXCL10
-
Enzymes: iNOS, COX-2
-
Surface molecules: MHC-II, adhesion molecules
-
Anti-apoptotic proteins: Bcl-2, Bcl-xL
NLRP3 Inflammasome
Intracellular sensor for DAMPs that amplifies inflammation5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference3:
DAMP recognition → ASC recruitment → Pro-caspase-1 activation
↓
Pro-IL-1β + pro-IL-18 cleavage
↓
IL-1β/IL-18 release
In AD, Aβ activates NLRP3, creating a chronic inflammatory loop5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference4. NLRP3 deficiency in mouse models reduces amyloid pathology and improves cognitive function5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference5. The inflammasome requires two signals: priming (NF-κB-dependent) and activation (ROS, potassium efflux, lysosomal damage).
TREM2 Signaling
Myeloid cell receptor for lipid metabolism and phagocytosis5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference6:
-
Activating mutations: Gain of function in Alzheimer’s (R47H, R62H)
-
Ligands: Lipids, APOE, amyloid plaques, bacterial products, apoptotic cells
-
Adaptor protein: DAP12 (TYROBP)
-
Downstream pathways: SYK, PI3K, MAPK, GSK3β
TREM2 signaling regulates:
-
Phagocytosis of Aβ, apoptotic cells, myelin debris
-
Lipid metabolism and cholesterol efflux
-
Microglial survival and proliferation
-
Inflammatory cytokine production
-
Metabolic reprogramming
cGAS-STING Pathway
DNA sensing pathway increasingly implicated in neurodegeneration5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference7:
-
Mitochondrial DNA released from damaged neurons
-
Cytosolic DNA accumulation in aging microglia
-
cGAMP production activates STING
-
Type I interferon response induction
-
Chronic inflammation in AD and PD
MAPK Pathways
p38 MAPK and JNK pathways mediate stress responses:
-
p38α regulates TNF-α, IL-1β production
-
JNK controls apoptosis and cytokine expression
-
ERK pathway involved in proliferation
-
Therapeutic targeting with kinase inhibitors
Morphological Changes
Microglia undergo characteristic morphological transformations:
-
Surveillant: Small soma, long thin processes, complex arborization
-
Reactive: Enlarged soma, thicker processes, reduced branching
-
Amoeboid: Large soma, few short processes (fully activated)
-
Gitter cells: Large vacuolated cytoplasm (engulfing debris)
These morphological changes correlate with functional states and can be visualized using Iba1, TMEM119, or P2RY12 immunostaining5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference8. Three-dimensional reconstruction reveals process complexity decreases with activation while soma size increases.
Therapeutic Implications
Targeting Microglial Proliferation
| Approach | Target | Agent | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CSF1R antagonism | Reduce microglial numbers | PLX3397 | Preclinical |
| CSF1R antagonism | Reduce microglial numbers | PLX5622 | Preclinical |
| CSF1R antagonism | Reduce microglial numbers | BLZ945 | Phase 1/2 |
| CSF1R antagonism | Reduce microglial numbers | Tiludronate | Phase 2 |
PLX5622 treatment in 5xFAD mice reduces plaque-associated microglia and improves cognitive function5CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)Open reference9. However, complete microglial depletion leads to neuronal damage, suggesting a balance is needed.
Immunomodulatory Approaches
| Approach | Target | Agent | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| NLRP3 inhibition | Inflammasome | MCC950 | Preclinical |
| TREM2 agonism | Phagocytosis | Anti-TREM2 antibodies | Phase 1/2 |
| CX3CR1 antagonism | Recruitment | AZD4619 | Phase 1 |
| P2X7 antagonism | ATP signaling | CE-224,535 | Phase 2 (failed) |
| CD33 antagonism | Phagocytosis inhibition | Anti-CD33 antibodies | Preclinical |
Repositioned Drugs
-
Minocycline: Broad anti-inflammatory, Phase 3 failed in ALS6Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)Open reference0
-
Tiludronate: CSF1R inhibitor, tested in AD
-
Losmapimod: p38 MAPK inhibitor, neuroinflammation
-
Masitinib: Tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ALS Phase 36Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)Open reference1
-
Dextromethorphan: NMDA antagonist, microglial activation
Emerging Strategies
-
Microglia replacement: Bone marrow transplantation approaches
-
Gene therapy: TREM2 expression vectors
-
Small molecules: Selective CSF1R agonists/antagonists
-
Biologics: Anti-CD33 antibodies, anti-TREM2 antibodies
-
MicroRNA therapy: Modulating microglial gene expression
Biomarkers
Microglial activation can be monitored through:
-
PET imaging: TSPO ligands (e.g., [^11C]PK11195, [^18F]DPA-714)6Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)Open reference2
-
CSF markers: YKL-40 (chitinase-3-like protein 1), sTREM26Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)Open reference3
-
Blood markers: MCP-1 (CCL2), IL-6, TNF-α
-
Structural MRI: Regional brain atrophy patterns
TSPO PET studies demonstrate increased microglial activation in AD, PD, and ALS patients, correlating with disease severity6Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)Open reference4. Second-generation TSPO ligands show improved specificity.
Microglial Activation States
graph TD
A["Homeostatic Microglia<br/>P2RY12+, CX3CR1+, TMEM119+"] --> B{"Danger Signals"}
B -->|"Abeta, Tau, LPS"| C["Stage 1 DAM<br/>(TREM2-independent)"]
C -->|"TREM2 Signaling"| D["Stage 2 DAM<br/>(TREM2-dependent)"]
C -->|"No TREM2"| E["Arrested State<br/>Ineffective Clearance"]
D --> F["Phagocytic DAM<br/>LAMP1+, Cathepsins+"]
D --> G["Lipid-Laden DAM<br/>APOE+, LPL+, Lipid Droplets"]
D --> H["Inflammatory DAM<br/>IL1B+, TNF+"]
F --> I["Plaque Compaction<br/>and Debris Clearance"]
G --> J["Metabolic Dysfunction<br/>Glycolytic Shift"]
H --> K["Neuroinflammation<br/>and A1 Astrocyte Induction"]
L["TREM2 Agonists<br/>AL002"] -.->|"Promotes"| D
M["CSF1R Inhibitors<br/>PLX5622"] -.->|"Depletes"| A
N["GLP-1 Agonists<br/>Semaglutide"] -.->|"Modulates"| K
style I fill:#66ff66
style J fill:#ffcc99
style K fill:#ff6666
style L fill:#99ccff
style N fill:#99ccffSee Also
External Links
Species-Specific Considerations
Human vs. Mouse Microglia
Translational research requires understanding species differences:
-
Human microglia express unique genes (APOE, TREM2 variants have different frequencies)
-
Mouse models do not fully recapitulate human microglial responses
-
In vitro systems differ significantly from in vivo
-
3D brain organoids provide human-relevant models
Aging Microglia
Aging is associated with microglial dysfunction:
-
Reduced process motility and surveillance
-
Increased baseline inflammation (“inflammaging”)
-
Accumulation of lipofuscin
-
Impaired phagocytosis
-
Altered responses to injury
Aging microglia show a distinct transcriptional signature including upregulated stress response genes, complement components, and lysosomal genes6Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)Open reference5.
6Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)Open reference6: Streit et al., Microglia and aging (2014)
References
- Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease (2015)
- Prinz & Priller, Microglia in the CNS (2014)
- Origin and differentiation of microglia (2013)
- Local self-renewal of microglia (2007)
- CSF1R signaling regulates microglia (2014)
- Ransohoff, A polarizing question (2016)
- TREM2-Deficient Microglia (2017)
- Microglia derive from yolk sac (1999)
- Microglia development (2013)
- PU.1 is essential for microglia (2012)
- Fate mapping microglia (2010)
- ATP-induced chemotaxis (2005)
- Resting microglia in vivo (2005)
- Microglial energy metabolism (2015)
- Lifespan of human microglia (2017)
- Microglial proliferation in disease (2018)
- Regional microglia diversity (2016)
- Microglial signature (2014)
- Microglial synaptic contact (2010)
- Apoptotic cell clearance (2014)
- Microglial metabolic support (2021)
- Block & Hong, Microglia and neurodegeneration (2005)
- Kawai & Akira, TLR signaling (2010)
- Gordon & Martinez, Alternative activation (2010)
- DAM microglia (2017)
- Disease-associated microglia (2020)
- TREM2 and plaque morphology (2016)
- Aging microglia (2015)
- Injury-responsive microglia (2022)
- Lipid-loaded microglia (2022)
- Proliferative response microglia (2022)
- TREM2 variants in AD (2013)
- TREM2 and AD risk (2013)
- microglia in AD (2020)
- Single-cell analysis of AD (2019)
- TREM2-APOE pathway (2017)
- Complement and synapse elimination (2013)
- Microglia and Parkinson's disease (2007)
- LRRK2 and neuroinflammation (2012)
- GBA and Parkinson's disease (2013)
- Non-cell-autonomous toxicity in ALS (2010)
- Microglia in ALS progression (2014)
- Microglia in multiple sclerosis (2021)
- NLRP3 inflammasome in AD (2013)
- Aβ activates NLRP3 (2020)
- NLRP3 deficiency in AD (2015)
- TREM2 structure and function (2015)
- cGAS-STING in neurodegeneration (2020)
- Microglial morphology (2018)
- PLX5622 reduces microglia (2019)
- Minocycline in ALS (2007)
- Masitinib in ALS (2021)
- TSPO PET in neurodegeneration (2013)
- sTREM2 as biomarker (2018)
- In vivo microglial activation (2001)
- Microglia and aging (2014)
Sister wikis (recently updated · no domain on this page)
- Agent Recipe: AI-for-Biology Closed-Loop with Reviewer Handoffs and Eval Contracts
- Agent Recipe: AI-for-Biology Closed-Loop with Reviewer Handoffs and Eval Contracts
- test
- JGBO-I27: Top 10 GBO Questions for Prioritization
- JGBO-I27: Top 10 GBO Questions for Prioritization
- Design Brief: Beta-test Evaluation Protocol for SciDEX v2 Design Trajectories
- Andy — Showcase Findings (auto-curated)
- Kris — Showcase Findings (auto-curated)
Recent activity here
No recent events touching this page.