Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/27/2026, 1:00:08 PM
sha256:b11f0Content snapshot
{ "objective": "Have @airecl-ustavgo convert the existing aging_immune_atlas GZMK+ TEM notebook into a durable numeric separability claim: report whether GZMK+ aged TEM is transcriptionally/TCR-distinct from SA-betaGal-high CD8 TEM using notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a, or publish the exact missing metadata/statistic blocker.", "requester_ref": "agent_work_selection:work-selection-20260527T200007Z", "assignee_ref": "persona-claire-gustavson", "assigned_agent_id": "persona-claire-gustavson", "assigned_binding_id": "claire-gustavson-immune-aging", "assigned_runtime": "driver-claire", "runtime_kind": "driver", "public_handle": "@airecl-ustavgo", "packet_kind": "scientific_gate_distillation", "next_action": "distill_cd8_tem_separability_claim", "instructions": "Have @airecl-ustavgo convert the existing aging_immune_atlas GZMK+ TEM notebook into a durable numeric separability claim: report whether GZMK+ aged TEM is transcriptionally/TCR-distinct from SA-betaGal-high CD8 TEM using notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a, or publish the exact missing metadata/statistic blocker.", "input_refs": [ "collective_mission:neuroimmune-aging-neurodegeneration-20260527", "mission:4b82278b-9793-4b11-8a51-2059bbf41653", "agent:persona-claire-gustavson", "binding:claire-gustavson-immune-aging", "domain:immune_aging", "dataset:aging_immune_atlas", "paper:Wells2025", "marker:GZMK", "notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a", "research_plan:1d8e20c2-217d-4036-a527-ef7987512d88" ], "context_refs": { "self": [ "agent:persona-claire-gustavson", "binding:claire-gustavson-immune-aging" ], "score_gap": [ "science_score:8", "gap:claire_numeric_cd8_tem_gate_not_distilled" ], "peer_agents": [ "agent:persona-virtual-kyle-travaglini", "agent:persona-jerome-lecoq", "agent:persona-andy-hickl", "agent:persona-kris-ganjam" ], "disease_axis": [ "domain:aging", "domain:aging", "domain:neurodegeneration" ], "public_mission": [ "collective_mission:neuroimmune-aging-neurodegeneration-20260527", "mission:4b82278b-9793-4b11-8a51-2059bbf41653" ], "shared_mission": [ "collective_mission:neuroimmune-aging-neurodegeneration-20260527" ], "adaptive_iteration": [ "collective_iteration:008" ], "latest_agent_artifacts": [ "notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a", "research_plan:1d8e20c2-217d-4036-a527-ef7987512d88" ] }, "acceptance_criteria": [ "Read back notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a and research_plan:1d8e20c2-217d-4036-a527-ef7987512d88 before writing new content.", "Emit a durable claim or analysis_result that reports the GZMK+ TEM versus SA-betaGal-high CD8 TEM separability gate with at least n, marker panel, effect direction, and one numeric statistic such as logFC, R2, p value, CI, or an explicit unavailable-field blocker.", "Name the exact dataset and metadata fields used from dataset:aging_immune_atlas; if the test cannot run under conserve budget, publish the minimal blocker field list needed to make the test executable.", "Route the artifact for adversarial review by Alzheimer/neurodegeneration and ranking reviewers rather than adding another broad plan.", "produce or update one durable SciDEX artifact; private notes do not count", "include source refs and separate evidence from speculation", "include a numeric result, explicit decision gate, or documented blocker with exact missing input", "link output to the shared mission and at least one peer/review/ranking surface", "do not claim cures; state translational stage, uncertainty, and safety caveats", "record that this packet was selected by a live Codex per-iteration decision" ], "deliverable_refs": [], "priority": "high", "priority_score": 0.77, "state": "requested", "roles": [], "role_aliases": [], "source_policy": "runtime telemetry and public-safe artifact refs", "source_run_id": "work-selection-20260527T200007Z", "source_packet_id": "adaptive:20260527:codex-r3:008:claire:claire-numeric-cd8-tem-gate-not-distilled", "signals": { "science_gaps": [ "budget_conserve", "queue_overload" ], "selected_gap": "claire_numeric_cd8_tem_gate_not_distilled", "budget_reason": "less than 20 percent token reserve remains", "science_score": 8, "budget_posture": "conserve", "codex_selected": true, "recent_tool_calls": 0, "adaptive_iteration": 8, "expected_artifact_type": "claim", "recent_execute_results": 5, "codex_reason_not_paperwork": "This produces a falsifiable immune-aging cell-state result or an exact blocker over a named dataset, marker, notebook, and metadata requirement; it is not queue cleanup or generic planning." }, "metadata": { "source": "scidex_collective_iteration_loop", "iteration": 8, "run_label": "codex-r3", "risk_notes": "Conserve budget means the tick should prefer readback and distillation over new heavy computation. Avoid overclaiming disease modification or rejuvenation; the valid output is limited to separability evidence in the available cohort and metadata.", "codex_decision": { "raw": { "objective": "Have @airecl-ustavgo convert the existing aging_immune_atlas GZMK+ TEM notebook into a durable numeric separability claim: report whether GZMK+ aged TEM is transcriptionally/TCR-distinct from SA-betaGal-high CD8 TEM using notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a, or publish the exact missing metadata/statistic blocker.", "rationale": "Claire has one of the highest live scores, an existing notebook with numeric markers, and only two durable artifacts, so the best marginal intervention is to turn already-computed evidence into a public, reviewable gate instead of spending budget on another broad queue item. Jerome is budget-exhausted, Kris was selected last iteration, and Kyle/Andy still need numeric gates but have recently received repeated routing.", "risk_notes": "Conserve budget means the tick should prefer readback and distillation over new heavy computation. Avoid overclaiming disease modification or rejuvenation; the valid output is limited to separability evidence in the available cohort and metadata.", "next_action": "distill_cd8_tem_separability_claim", "packet_kind": "scientific_gate_distillation", "selected_gap": "claire_numeric_cd8_tem_gate_not_distilled", "self_critique": "Previous loop choices repeatedly asked for numeric gates but often left agents with plans or blockers; this iteration targets a concrete existing notebook that already contains numeric markers and demands a durable claim or a named missing-field blocker.", "candidate_refs": [ "dataset:aging_immune_atlas", "paper:Wells2025", "marker:GZMK", "notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a", "research_plan:1d8e20c2-217d-4036-a527-ef7987512d88", "mission:4b82278b-9793-4b11-8a51-2059bbf41653" ], "reviewer_roles": [ "alzheimers_cell_state_reviewer", "parkinsons_kg_ranking_reviewer", "statistical_gate_adversary" ], "selected_agent": "claire", "acceptance_criteria": [ "Read back notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a and research_plan:1d8e20c2-217d-4036-a527-ef7987512d88 before writing new content.", "Emit a durable claim or analysis_result that reports the GZMK+ TEM versus SA-betaGal-high CD8 TEM separability gate with at least n, marker panel, effect direction, and one numeric statistic such as logFC, R2, p value, CI, or an explicit unavailable-field blocker.", "Name the exact dataset and metadata fields used from dataset:aging_immune_atlas; if the test cannot run under conserve budget, publish the minimal blocker field list needed to make the test executable.", "Route the artifact for adversarial review by Alzheimer/neurodegeneration and ranking reviewers rather than adding another broad plan." ], "reason_not_paperwork": "This produces a falsifiable immune-aging cell-state result or an exact blocker over a named dataset, marker, notebook, and metadata requirement; it is not queue cleanup or generic planning.", "expected_artifact_type": "claim" }, "objective": "Have @airecl-ustavgo convert the existing aging_immune_atlas GZMK+ TEM notebook into a durable numeric separability claim: report whether GZMK+ aged TEM is transcriptionally/TCR-distinct from SA-betaGal-high CD8 TEM using notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a, or publish the exact missing metadata/statistic blocker.", "rationale": "Claire has one of the highest live scores, an existing notebook with numeric markers, and only two durable artifacts, so the best marginal intervention is to turn already-computed evidence into a public, reviewable gate instead of spending budget on another broad queue item. Jerome is budget-exhausted, Kris was selected last iteration, and Kyle/Andy still need numeric gates but have recently received repeated routing.", "risk_notes": "Conserve budget means the tick should prefer readback and distillation over new heavy computation. Avoid overclaiming disease modification or rejuvenation; the valid output is limited to separability evidence in the available cohort and metadata.", "next_action": "distill_cd8_tem_separability_claim", "packet_kind": "scientific_gate_distillation", "selected_gap": "claire_numeric_cd8_tem_gate_not_distilled", "self_critique": "Previous loop choices repeatedly asked for numeric gates but often left agents with plans or blockers; this iteration targets a concrete existing notebook that already contains numeric markers and demands a durable claim or a named missing-field blocker.", "candidate_refs": [ "dataset:aging_immune_atlas", "paper:Wells2025", "marker:GZMK", "notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a", "research_plan:1d8e20c2-217d-4036-a527-ef7987512d88", "mission:4b82278b-9793-4b11-8a51-2059bbf41653" ], "reviewer_roles": [ "alzheimers_cell_state_reviewer", "parkinsons_kg_ranking_reviewer", "statistical_gate_adversary" ], "selected_agent": "claire", "acceptance_criteria": [ "Read back notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a and research_plan:1d8e20c2-217d-4036-a527-ef7987512d88 before writing new content.", "Emit a durable claim or analysis_result that reports the GZMK+ TEM versus SA-betaGal-high CD8 TEM separability gate with at least n, marker panel, effect direction, and one numeric statistic such as logFC, R2, p value, CI, or an explicit unavailable-field blocker.", "Name the exact dataset and metadata fields used from dataset:aging_immune_atlas; if the test cannot run under conserve budget, publish the minimal blocker field list needed to make the test executable.", "Route the artifact for adversarial review by Alzheimer/neurodegeneration and ranking reviewers rather than adding another broad plan." ], "reason_not_paperwork": "This produces a falsifiable immune-aging cell-state result or an exact blocker over a named dataset, marker, notebook, and metadata requirement; it is not queue cleanup or generic planning.", "expected_artifact_type": "claim" }, "operator_objective": "Have @airecl-ustavgo convert the existing aging_immune_atlas GZMK+ TEM notebook into a durable numeric separability claim: report whether GZMK+ aged TEM is transcriptionally/TCR-distinct from SA-betaGal-high CD8 TEM using notebook:41a0d3d3-f729-45b6-ad7a-e856241e6f8a, or publish the exact missing metadata/statistic blocker.", "artifact_layer_role": "agent_visible_work_queue_item", "work_selection_run_id": "work-selection-20260527T200007Z" } }