Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
0907b4360f2aContent snapshot
{ "scope": "mouse PFC–visTRN–LGN (cross-modal divided-attention task)", "claim_text": "Cross-modal sensory selection in mice depends on PFC interactions with the visual thalamic reticular nucleus (visTRN), whose feedforward inhibition dynamically controls visual thalamic gain.", "raw_fields": { "n": 15, "doi": "10.1038/nature15398", "claim": "Cross-modal sensory selection in mice depends on PFC interactions with the visual thalamic reticular nucleus (visTRN), whose feedforward inhibition dynamically controls visual thalamic gain.", "cite_key": "Wimmer2015", "evidence": "Optogenetic perturbations of PFC and visTRN with electrophysiology and intracellular chloride photometry during a cross-modal divided-attention task in mice.", "effect_size": "Performance on two modalities balanced; n=15 mice; visTRN photoinhibition produces modality-specific behavioral changes", "text_access": "fulltext", "study_system": "mouse PFC–visTRN–LGN (cross-modal divided-attention task)", "source_cluster_id": "cluster_05", "replication_status": "independently_replicated", "claim_source_sentence": "Equivalent sensory thalamocortical manipulations showed that behaviour was causally dependent on PFC interactions with the sensory thalamus, not sensory cortex.", "replication_evidence_dois": [ "10.1126/science.1223082", "10.1038/nature22073" ], "effect_size_source_sentence": "Performance on the two modalities was balanced (n = 15 mice, Fig." }, "section_id": "section_06", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_06_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": "Performance on two modalities balanced; n=15 mice; visTRN photoinhibition produces modality-specific behavioral changes", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewLoops", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-06", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_06_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-2a53381ce8a2" ], "source_span": "Equivalent sensory thalamocortical manipulations showed that behaviour was causally dependent on PFC interactions with the sensory thalamus, not sensory cortex.", "study_system": "mouse PFC–visTRN–LGN (cross-modal divided-attention task)", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:paper-2a53381ce8a2" } ], "section_title": "Thalamic Feedback: Closing the Loop", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops" }, "evidence_summary": "Optogenetic perturbations of PFC and visTRN with electrophysiology and intracellular chloride photometry during a cross-modal divided-attention task in mice.", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9", "replication_status": "independently_replicated", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-06", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_06_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops" }