Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
9ce0bd5c26caContent snapshot
{ "scope": "Mouse multi-lab Neuropixels reproducibility study; secondary visual areas / hippocampus / thalamus", "claim_text": "A 10-laboratory International Brain Laboratory replication study repeatedly targeted Neuropixels probes to the same brain locations (secondary visual areas, hippocampus, and thalamus) in mice performing a standardized decision-making task and developed RIGOR histological and electrophysiological quality-control criteria to enhance reproducibility.", "raw_fields": { "n": 121, "doi": "10.7554/elife.100840", "claim": "A 10-laboratory International Brain Laboratory replication study repeatedly targeted Neuropixels probes to the same brain locations (secondary visual areas, hippocampus, and thalamus) in mice performing a standardized decision-making task and developed RIGOR histological and electrophysiological quality-control criteria to enhance reproducibility.", "cite_key": "InternationalBrainLaboratory2025b", "evidence": "Empirical assessment that even with standardized hardware and task, electrode targeting and limited statistical power drive cross-lab variability; explicit QC criteria offered as mitigation.", "effect_size": "121 experimental replicates from 10 labs", "text_access": "fulltext", "study_system": "Mouse multi-lab Neuropixels reproducibility study; secondary visual areas / hippocampus / thalamus", "argument_role": "supporting", "replication_status": "single-study", "claim_source_sentence": "This pipeline included stringent new histological and electrophysiological quality-control criteria (the ‘Recording Inclusion Guidelines for Optimizing Reproducibility’ [RIGOR]) that are applicable to datasets beyond our own.", "source_provenance_status": "ok", "replication_evidence_dois": [], "effect_size_source_sentence": "Experimenters in 10 laboratories repeatedly targeted Neuropixels probes to the same location (spanning secondary visual areas, hippocampus, and thalamus) in mice making decisions; this generated a total of 121 experimental replicates, a unique dataset for evaluating reproducibility of electrophysiology experiments." }, "section_id": "section_16", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": "121 experimental replicates from 10 labs", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-16-synthesis", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:805df180-8279-474b-b134-8b931e75d832" ], "source_span": "This pipeline included stringent new histological and electrophysiological quality-control criteria (the ‘Recording Inclusion Guidelines for Optimizing Reproducibility’ [RIGOR]) that are applicable to datasets beyond our own.", "study_system": "Mouse multi-lab Neuropixels reproducibility study; secondary visual areas / hippocampus / thalamus", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:805df180-8279-474b-b134-8b931e75d832" } ], "section_title": "16. Synthesis — which computational claims the mouse-cortex E→E empirical record actually supports, where the bottleneck observations are, and what an inhibition-free, single-species, basic-research analytic framing misses", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }, "evidence_summary": "Empirical assessment that even with standardized hardware and task, electrode targeting and limited statistical power drive cross-lab variability; explicit QC criteria offered as mitigation.", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "replication_status": "single-study", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-16-synthesis", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_16_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }