Details
- scope
- Refractory OCD patients across DBS, TMS, tDCS, ECT, VNS systematic review
- claim_text
- DBS efficacy in refractory OCD is best when targeting the crossroad between nucleus accumbens and ventral capsule or the subthalamic nucleus; brain-stimulation studies remain methodologically inconsistent.
- section_id
- section_14
- source_url
- https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json
- review_repo
- ComputationalReviewLoops
- section_ref
- wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-14
- source_kind
- review_finding
- source_path
- evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json
- study_system
- Refractory OCD patients across DBS, TMS, tDCS, ECT, VNS systematic review
- section_title
- Loop Dysfunction in Neurological and Psychiatric Disease
- evidence_summary
- Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of brain stimulation in OCD across PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science.
- review_bundle_ref
- analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9
- replication_status
- independently_replicated
- review_package_ref
- analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9
- source_artifact_ref
- wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-14
- origin_url
- https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_14_evidence_package.json
- commit_sha
- 0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b
- created_by
- persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience
- repository_url
- https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops
Raw fields (5)
- raw_fields
{ "n": 0, "doi": "10.2174/1570159x17666190409142555", "claim": "DBS efficacy in refractory OCD is best when targeting the crossroad between nucleus accumbens and ventral capsule or the subthalamic nucleus; brain-stimulation studies remain methodologically inconsistent.", "cite_key": "Rapinesi2019", "evidence": "Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of brain stimulation in OCD across PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science.", "effect_size": null, "text_access": "fulltext", "study_system": "Refractory OCD patients across DBS, TMS, tDCS, ECT, VNS systematic review", "source_cluster_id": "cluster_13", "replication_status": "independently_replicated", "claim_source_sentence": "Study N Age, Years (Range) Female/ Male (N) Design Observation (Months) DBS Target Results/Conclusions \nMallet et al., 2008 [97] 17 43.05 (29-56) 7/10 Randomized, double-blind, crossover study: two 3-month, and a 1-month washout phases 10 Subthalamic nucleus Active (second) vs. sham (first) stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: Y-BOCS scores was significantly lower.", "replication_evidence_dois": [ "10.1371/journal.pone.0133591", "10.1038/s41380-020-00933-x" ], "effect_size_source_sentence": "The results of two open studies of VC/VS DBS in OCD patients were in the same direction, with one finding an average 22.2 point drop on the Y-BOCS (60%) after two years in four OCD patients [90] and the other a 12.2 point drop (33%) after 15 months in another four patients [91]." }- source_refs
[ "paper:paper-970adda75256" ]
- source_span
Study N Age, Years (Range) Female/ Male (N) Design Observation (Months) DBS Target Results/Conclusions Mallet et al., 2008 [97] 17 43.05 (29-56) 7/10 Randomized, double-blind, crossover study: two 3-month, and a 1-month washout phases 10 Subthalamic nucleus Active (second) vs. sham (first) stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: Y-BOCS scores was significantly lower.
- evidence_refs
[ { "ref": "paper:paper-970adda75256" } ]- source_policy
{ "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops" }