Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
41a1e9a7937dContent snapshot
{ "scope": "Mouse cortex in vivo, opsin-free controls", "claim_text": "Optical-fiber laser stimulation at 637, 594 or 473 nm in mouse cortex without exogenous opsins evoked strong contralateral visual-cortex neuronal responses even at low intensities (1 mW at fiber tip), most pronounced at 637 nm — a methodological caveat for optogenetic-stimulation studies in mouse cortex.", "raw_fields": { "n": 0, "doi": "10.1016/j.isci.2024.111152", "claim": "Optical-fiber laser stimulation at 637, 594 or 473 nm in mouse cortex without exogenous opsins evoked strong contralateral visual-cortex neuronal responses even at low intensities (1 mW at fiber tip), most pronounced at 637 nm — a methodological caveat for optogenetic-stimulation studies in mouse cortex.", "cite_key": "Weiler2024", "evidence": "Opsin-free control mice; cross-wavelength dose response; dim background-light rescue suppresses off-target activation at 594/473 nm but not at higher 637-nm intensities.", "effect_size": "responses at 1 mW fiber tip power; ≤2.5 mW required to suppress 637-nm-evoked off-target activation under dim light", "text_access": "fulltext", "study_system": "Mouse cortex in vivo, opsin-free controls", "argument_role": "supporting", "replication_status": "single-study-methodological-caveat", "claim_source_sentence": "Here, we found that optical fiber laser stimulation at wavelengths of 637, 594, or 473 nm within the cortex of mice lacking expression of exogenous opsins resulted in a strong neuronal response in the contralateral visual cortex. Evoked responses were observed even at low laser intensities (fiber tip power 1 mW) and most pronounced at 637 nm.", "source_provenance_status": "ok", "replication_evidence_dois": [], "effect_size_source_sentence": "Evoked responses were observed even at low laser intensities (fiber tip power 1 mW) and most pronounced at 637 nm." }, "section_id": "section_15", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": "responses at 1 mW fiber tip power; ≤2.5 mW required to suppress 637-nm-evoked off-target activation under dim light", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-15-methods-limits", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-5515978cc90a" ], "source_span": "Here, we found that optical fiber laser stimulation at wavelengths of 637, 594, or 473 nm within the cortex of mice lacking expression of exogenous opsins resulted in a strong neuronal response in the contralateral visual cortex. Evoked responses were observed even at low laser intensities (fiber tip power 1 mW) and most pronounced at 637 nm.", "study_system": "Mouse cortex in vivo, opsin-free controls", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:paper-5515978cc90a" } ], "section_title": "15. Methodological limits and emerging tools — what current mouse-cortex tools cannot yet measure about E→E recurrence (subthreshold network activity, fast plasticity in vivo, millimetre-scale dynamic connectomes), and what is on the near horizon", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }, "evidence_summary": "Opsin-free control mice; cross-wavelength dose response; dim background-light rescue suppresses off-target activation at 594/473 nm but not at higher 637-nm intensities.", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "replication_status": "single-study-methodological-caveat", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-15-methods-limits", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }