- claim_text
Mouse V1 prediction-error signals are generated by a cooperative thalamocortical disinhibitory circuit: violating predictions with unexpected visual stimuli preferentially boosts responses of L2/3 V1 neurons most selective for that stimulus, demonstrating that prediction errors specifically amplify the unexpected input (rather than generating non-specific surprise signals) — implemented by a circuit involving cortically driven thalamic input and local disinhibition.
- raw_fields
{
"n": 0,
"doi": "10.1038/s41586-024-07851-w",
"claim": "Mouse V1 prediction-error signals are generated by a cooperative thalamocortical disinhibitory circuit: violating predictions with unexpected visual stimuli preferentially boosts responses of L2/3 V1 neurons most selective for that stimulus, demonstrating that prediction errors specifically amplify the unexpected input (rather than generating non-specific surprise signals) — implemented by a circuit involving cortically driven thalamic input and local disinhibition.",
"cite_key": "Furutachi2024",
"evidence": "Two-photon Ca²⁺ imaging + cell-type-specific optogenetic perturbations of mouse V1 L2/3 plus pulvinar thalamic input during prediction-error paradigm.",
"effect_size": "qualitative — selective amplification of expected-stimulus-tuned neurons by thalamocortical disinhibition",
"text_access": "fulltext",
"study_system": "awake mouse V1 L2/3 plus pulvinar thalamic input during visual prediction-error task",
"argument_role": "supporting",
"replication_status": "single_study",
"claim_source_sentence": "violating animals' predictions by an unexpected visual stimulus preferentially boosts responses of the layer 2/3 V1 neurons that are most selective for that stimulus. Prediction errors specifically amplify the unexpected visual input, rather than representing non-specific surprise or difference signals",
"source_provenance_status": "ok",
"replication_evidence_dois": [],
"effect_size_source_sentence": "Prediction errors specifically amplify the unexpected visual input"
}- source_refs
[
"paper:paper-41aa556ea384"
]
- source_span
violating animals' predictions by an unexpected visual stimulus preferentially boosts responses of the layer 2/3 V1 neurons that are most selective for that stimulus. Prediction errors specifically amplify the unexpected visual input, rather than representing non-specific surprise or difference signals
- evidence_refs
[
{
"ref": "paper:paper-41aa556ea384"
}
]- source_policy
{
"mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
"notes": [
"Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
"SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
],
"source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f",
"source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence"
}