Version history

{
  "scope": "birds",
  "claim_text": "We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance).",
  "raw_fields": {
    "n": 20,
    "doi": "10.1016/j.isci.2025.114398",
    "claim": "We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance).",
    "cite_key": "Zai2026",
    "evidence": "fulltext",
    "effect_size": "45%",
    "text_access": "fulltext",
    "study_system": "birds",
    "source_cluster_id": "cluster_14",
    "replication_status": "replication_unknown",
    "claim_source_sentence": "We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance).",
    "replication_evidence_dois": [],
    "effect_size_source_sentence": "We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance)."
  },
  "section_id": "section_15",
  "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json",
  "effect_size": "45%",
  "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewLoops",
  "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-15",
  "source_kind": "review_finding",
  "source_path": "evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json",
  "source_refs": [
    "paper:paper-18a0ca92fe19"
  ],
  "source_span": "We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance).",
  "study_system": "birds",
  "evidence_refs": [
    {
      "ref": "paper:paper-18a0ca92fe19"
    }
  ],
  "section_title": "Species Differences and Evolutionary Scaling of Loop Architecture",
  "source_policy": {
    "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
    "notes": [
      "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
      "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
    ],
    "source_commit_sha": "0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b",
    "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops"
  },
  "evidence_summary": "fulltext",
  "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9",
  "replication_status": "replication_unknown",
  "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9",
  "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-15",
  "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json",
  "commit_sha": "0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b",
  "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
  "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops"
}