Details

scope
birds
section_id
section_15
source_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json
effect_size
45%
review_repo
ComputationalReviewLoops
section_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-15
source_kind
review_finding
source_path
evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json
study_system
birds
section_title
Species Differences and Evolutionary Scaling of Loop Architecture
evidence_summary
fulltext
review_bundle_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9
replication_status
replication_unknown
review_package_ref
analysis_bundle:ab-d49e54403ef9
source_artifact_ref
wiki_page:computationalreviewloops-15
origin_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops/blob/0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b/evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json
commit_sha
0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b
created_by
persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience
repository_url
https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops
Raw fields (6)
claim_text
We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance).
raw_fields
{
  "n": 20,
  "doi": "10.1016/j.isci.2025.114398",
  "claim": "We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance).",
  "cite_key": "Zai2026",
  "evidence": "fulltext",
  "effect_size": "45%",
  "text_access": "fulltext",
  "study_system": "birds",
  "source_cluster_id": "cluster_14",
  "replication_status": "replication_unknown",
  "claim_source_sentence": "We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance).",
  "replication_evidence_dois": [],
  "effect_size_source_sentence": "We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance)."
}
source_refs
[
  "paper:paper-18a0ca92fe19"
]
source_span
We found that exploration was also a better predictor of lesion outcome than a simpler model 47 in which LMAN’s effect is estimated as the motor residual following pitch detrending (ρ = 0.67, p = 0.001, n = 20 birds, regression fit explained 45% of the variance).
evidence_refs
[
  {
    "ref": "paper:paper-18a0ca92fe19"
  }
]
source_policy
{
  "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
  "notes": [
    "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
    "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
  ],
  "source_commit_sha": "0632aae8abc141909207fe91f6349b9e36489c3b",
  "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewLoops"
}

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Replication

No replications yet

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.