Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
3be3afd816deContent snapshot
{ "scope": "Mouse cortex; all-optical transgenic for soma-targeted opsin and calcium indicator", "claim_text": "Read-out plus write-in of cell-specific firing rates in mouse cortex requires per-cell calibration of photostimulation and a co-expressed soma-targeted opsin/indicator transgenic — a methodological pre-condition that current all-optical experiments often lack.", "raw_fields": { "n": 0, "doi": "10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112909", "claim": "Read-out plus write-in of cell-specific firing rates in mouse cortex requires per-cell calibration of photostimulation and a co-expressed soma-targeted opsin/indicator transgenic — a methodological pre-condition that current all-optical experiments often lack.", "cite_key": "Bounds2023", "evidence": "Explicit statement of an outstanding limit of all-optical mouse-cortex interrogation — directly addresses cluster_14's resolution-limit topic.", "effect_size": null, "text_access": "abstract_only", "study_system": "Mouse cortex; all-optical transgenic for soma-targeted opsin and calcium indicator", "argument_role": "supporting", "replication_status": "single-study", "claim_source_sentence": "However, these techniques are unable to test how patterns of activity across a population contribute to computation because of an inability to both read and write cell-specific firing rates.", "source_provenance_status": "non_substring_match", "replication_evidence_dois": [], "effect_size_source_sentence": null }, "section_id": "section_15", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": null, "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewRecurrence", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-15-methods-limits", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-f323df6178be" ], "source_span": "However, these techniques are unable to test how patterns of activity across a population contribute to computation because of an inability to both read and write cell-specific firing rates.", "study_system": "Mouse cortex; all-optical transgenic for soma-targeted opsin and calcium indicator", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:paper-f323df6178be" } ], "section_title": "15. Methodological limits and emerging tools — what current mouse-cortex tools cannot yet measure about E→E recurrence (subthreshold network activity, fast plasticity in vivo, millimetre-scale dynamic connectomes), and what is on the near horizon", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }, "evidence_summary": "Explicit statement of an outstanding limit of all-optical mouse-cortex interrogation — directly addresses cluster_14's resolution-limit topic.", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "replication_status": "single-study", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-d9c479db9be9", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewrecurrence-15-methods-limits", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence/blob/79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f/evidence/section_15_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "79ce062d54a924ce05953ec90aa9d26044d2b48f", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewRecurrence" }