Version history
1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.
- Live5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
d6dd08b8e866Content snapshot
{ "scope": "mouse VISp Patch-seq", "claim_text": "Patch-seq electrophysiological 'subthreshold-2' principal component is highly correlated with input resistance (Pearson r = 0.90), and a separate 'subthreshold (normalized) 1' PC reflects sag amplitude during hyperpolarizing current — providing two orthogonal axes of intrinsic-property variation that can be regressed onto t-type identity.", "raw_fields": { "n": 4270, "doi": "10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.057", "claim": "Patch-seq electrophysiological 'subthreshold-2' principal component is highly correlated with input resistance (Pearson r = 0.90), and a separate 'subthreshold (normalized) 1' PC reflects sag amplitude during hyperpolarizing current — providing two orthogonal axes of intrinsic-property variation that can be regressed onto t-type identity.", "title": null, "cite_key": "Gouwens2020a", "evidence": "PCA over 4,200+ Patch-seq cells; principal-component-vs-feature correlations across all neurons (excitatory + inhibitory).", "effect_size": "sPC2 ↔ Rin: r = 0.90 (Pearson); sPC1(norm) ↔ sag", "text_access": "fulltext", "study_system": "mouse VISp Patch-seq", "_source_cluster": "cluster_04_intrinsic_electrophysiology", "replication_status": "replication_unknown", "_source_cluster_index": 28, "claim_source_sentence": "Many of the sPCs were strongly related to traditional electrophysiological features; for example, the “subthreshold 2” sPC was correlated with input resistance (Pearson’s r = 0.90), and the “subthreshold (normalized) 1” sPC reflected the amount of sag induced by hyperpolarizing current steps (lower ...).", "replication_evidence_dois": [], "effect_size_source_sentence": "the “subthreshold 2” sPC was correlated with input resistance (Pearson’s r = 0.90)" }, "section_id": "section_05", "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewVIP/blob/95e761177f7d2ec565983d3307c14ec238f9677c/evidence/section_05_evidence_package.json", "effect_size": "sPC2 ↔ Rin: r = 0.90 (Pearson); sPC1(norm) ↔ sag", "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewVIP", "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewvip-05-electrophysiology", "source_kind": "review_finding", "source_path": "evidence/section_05_evidence_package.json", "source_refs": [ "paper:paper-pm-33186530" ], "source_span": "Many of the sPCs were strongly related to traditional electrophysiological features; for example, the “subthreshold 2” sPC was correlated with input resistance (Pearson’s r = 0.90), and the “subthreshold (normalized) 1” sPC reflected the amount of sag induced by hyperpolarizing current steps (lower ...).", "study_system": "mouse VISp Patch-seq", "evidence_refs": [ { "ref": "paper:paper-pm-33186530" } ], "section_title": "Intrinsic Electrophysiology", "source_policy": { "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context", "notes": [ "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.", "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose." ], "source_commit_sha": "95e761177f7d2ec565983d3307c14ec238f9677c", "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewVIP" }, "evidence_summary": "PCA over 4,200+ Patch-seq cells; principal-component-vs-feature correlations across all neurons (excitatory + inhibitory).", "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-2ce40c33e827", "replication_status": "replication_unknown", "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-2ce40c33e827", "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewvip-05-electrophysiology", "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewVIP/blob/95e761177f7d2ec565983d3307c14ec238f9677c/evidence/section_05_evidence_package.json", "commit_sha": "95e761177f7d2ec565983d3307c14ec238f9677c", "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience", "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewVIP" }