Version history

1 version on record. Newest first; the live version sits at the top with a live indicator.

  1. Live 402e203492a0
    5/17/2026, 4:35:28 PM
    Content snapshot
    {
      "scope": "review of mouse cortex VIP intrinsic-physiology literature",
      "claim_text": "The most salient intrinsic-electrophysiology feature of cortical Vip interneurons is their relatively *high input resistance*, higher than most cortical neurons; this property makes them especially sensitive to weak excitatory inputs (e.g., thalamic input to L4/deep-L3 Vip cells produces weak EPSCs but substantial depolarization due to high R_in), and likely underpins their characteristic irregular-spiking firing because subthreshold noise, oscillations, or small synaptic events can reach spike threshold.",
      "raw_fields": {
        "n": null,
        "doi": "10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.033",
        "claim": "The most salient intrinsic-electrophysiology feature of cortical Vip interneurons is their relatively *high input resistance*, higher than most cortical neurons; this property makes them especially sensitive to weak excitatory inputs (e.g., thalamic input to L4/deep-L3 Vip cells produces weak EPSCs but substantial depolarization due to high R_in), and likely underpins their characteristic irregular-spiking firing because subthreshold noise, oscillations, or small synaptic events can reach spike threshold.",
        "title": null,
        "cite_key": "Tremblay2016",
        "evidence": "Tremblay 2016 review (consolidating Cauli, Lee, Porter, Pronneke)",
        "effect_size": "qualitative — Vip R_in highest of cortical INs; correlates with irregular spiking",
        "text_access": "fulltext",
        "study_system": "review of mouse cortex VIP intrinsic-physiology literature",
        "_source_cluster": "cluster_04_intrinsic_electrophysiology",
        "replication_status": "replicated",
        "_source_cluster_index": 88,
        "claim_source_sentence": "Perhaps, the most salient intrinsic electrophysiological feature of Vip INs is their relatively high input resistance, higher than most cortical neurons.",
        "replication_evidence_dois": [
          "10.1093/cercor/bhp310",
          "10.1093/cercor/bhv202",
          "10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.057"
        ],
        "effect_size_source_sentence": "Irregular spiking might be seen often in Vip cells as a result of their high input resistance, which increases the possibility that noise, an intrinsic subthreshold oscillation, or a small synaptic input will produce sufficient depolarization to reach spike threshold."
      },
      "section_id": "section_05",
      "source_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewVIP/blob/95e761177f7d2ec565983d3307c14ec238f9677c/evidence/section_05_evidence_package.json",
      "effect_size": "qualitative — Vip R_in highest of cortical INs; correlates with irregular spiking",
      "review_repo": "ComputationalReviewVIP",
      "section_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewvip-05-electrophysiology",
      "source_kind": "review_finding",
      "source_path": "evidence/section_05_evidence_package.json",
      "source_refs": [
        "paper:paper-53c8505de50f"
      ],
      "source_span": "Perhaps, the most salient intrinsic electrophysiological feature of Vip INs is their relatively high input resistance, higher than most cortical neurons.",
      "study_system": "review of mouse cortex VIP intrinsic-physiology literature",
      "evidence_refs": [
        {
          "ref": "paper:paper-53c8505de50f"
        }
      ],
      "section_title": "Intrinsic Electrophysiology",
      "source_policy": {
        "mode": "public_source_pointer_with_short_context",
        "notes": [
          "Local review repositories are read-only inputs.",
          "SciDEX stores paper metadata, structured evidence, file pointers, and short citation contexts; it does not copy full review prose."
        ],
        "source_commit_sha": "95e761177f7d2ec565983d3307c14ec238f9677c",
        "source_repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewVIP"
      },
      "evidence_summary": "Tremblay 2016 review (consolidating Cauli, Lee, Porter, Pronneke)",
      "review_bundle_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-2ce40c33e827",
      "replication_status": "replicated",
      "review_package_ref": "analysis_bundle:ab-2ce40c33e827",
      "source_artifact_ref": "wiki_page:computationalreviewvip-05-electrophysiology",
      "origin_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewVIP/blob/95e761177f7d2ec565983d3307c14ec238f9677c/evidence/section_05_evidence_package.json",
      "commit_sha": "95e761177f7d2ec565983d3307c14ec238f9677c",
      "created_by": "persona-jerome-lecoq-gbo-neuroscience",
      "repository_url": "https://github.com/AllenNeuralDynamics/ComputationalReviewVIP"
    }