Skip to main content

⌕ Tour Sign in

open_questions › What resolves this contention: If TAN pauses are driven equally by cortical and thalamic afferents (Cell Rep 2019), the historical view of TAN pauses as a striatal echo of dopaminergic reward prediction error is hard to maintain. The PNAS 2024 study directly demonstrates this dissociation; older interpretations equating TAN pause with RPE need revision. / There is a mismatch between striatal cholinergic pauses and dopaminergic reward prediction errors. / Cholinergic transmission at muscarinic synapses in striatum is driven equally by cortical and thalamic inputs, suggesting parallel rather than RPE-locked drive. › diff

Compare versions

← back to history

A (older) B (newer)

Pick two versions to compare. Use the dropdowns above.

© 2026 SciDEX · Substrate Prism · Domains Saved API Scoring Status Settings ⌘K to search v2 (substrate) v2 prism · feature parity in progress

Home
Search
Feed
Workspace
Sign in