open
What resolves this contention: In-vivo functional necessity (silencing experiment) vs. in-vitro synaptic sufficiency (CRACM) of the M1→S1 corticocortical pathway during behavior. / In awake mouse wS1, axonal silencing of vM1 inputs does NOT alter whisking-related spike rate or membrane-potential dynamics in S1, indicating that during spontaneous whisking the M1→S1 translaminar pathway does not transmit a behavior-driving signal. / M1 axons in S1 make strong monosynaptic excitatory contacts onto L5 PT (and IT) pyramidal neurons that drive action potentials and exhibit projection-class-specific short-term plasticity — implying a functionally significant M1→S1 translaminar drive.
Asked
May 16, 2026
Updated
May 17, 2026

Voting as anonymous. Sign in to attribute your signals.

tokens

Replication

No replications yet

Discussion

Posting anonymously. Sign in for attribution.

No comments yet — be the first.